Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Minch Global Trade Inc. (CORPORATION) in TEXAS, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-275e4c9a · back to the summary
Vitamin D3 K2 Supplement with Vitamin D3 5000 IU
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 0.2 mg vitamin k2 (as mk-7) (menaquinone-7) claim matches the panel
MARKETING0.2 mg — listing title
PANELVitamin K2 (as MK-7) (Menaquinone-7) 0.2 mg — same amount
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 0.2 mg of vitamin k2 (as mk-7) (menaquinone-7), and the listing-image panel shows 0.2 mg vitamin k2 (as mk-7) (menaquinone-7) 2 softgels. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Total Fat | 1g | — | |
| Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol from Algae ) | 5000IU(125mcg) | — | |
| Vitamin K2 (as MK-7) (Menaquinone-7) | 200mcg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 102 to 140 between February 11 and July 16, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 15, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing3
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 101 on 2026-02-06 to 140 on 2026-07-16 (net +39). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…ergoes rigorous quality control to guarantee purity and potency Immune support: Each softgel contains 5000 I…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…EDIENTS NO ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS ADDITIVES FREE GMP PRODUCT SOY FREE GMO FREE GLUTEN FREE” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…la for Bone, Teeth, Muscle and Immune Health Support,120 Softgel Capsules Bone Support: Enhances…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-275e4c9a (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | GPGP GreenPeople |
| Source listing identifier | B0DLH2TB8X |
| Retailer listing title | Vitamin D3 K2 Supplement with Vitamin D3 5000 IU, 200 mcg Vitamin K2 M… show full titleVitamin D3 K2 Supplement with Vitamin D3 5000 IU, 200 mcg Vitamin K2 MK-7 & Natural Coconut Oil, Plant Based 2-1 Formula for Bone, Teeth, Muscle and Immune Health Support,120 Softgel Capsules |
| USPTO brand owner | Minch Global Trade Inc. · CORPORATION · TEXAS, USA |
| Owner filed address | 17734 Glade Landing Ln.,, Richmond, Houston, Texas 77407, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Softgels |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Pack statement | 120 SOFTGELS |
| Badges printed on pack | ADDITIVES FREE, GMP PRODUCT, SOY FREE, GMO FREE, GLUTEN FREE |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 1g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol from Algae ) | 5000IU(125mcg) | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin K2 (as MK-7) (Menaquinone-7) | 200mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“WITH NATURAL COCONUT OIL” · “2 IN 1 FORMULA” · “Supports Proper Calcium Absorption” · “Dietary Supplement Vegetarian” · “Bone Health Supports” · “Efficiently absorbed with coconut oil” · “D3 as cholecalciferol & K2 as MK-7” · “120 softgels for 60 servings”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Official brand domain: www.gpgpgreenpeople.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Vitamin K — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-275e4c9a · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai