full reportFull record · lc-463e58cb · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 8 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal | — | |
| Total Fat | 2.5 g | — | |
| Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate) | 5 mg | — | |
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids # | 2000 mg | — | |
| Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) | 1100 mg | — | |
| Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) | 700 mg | — | |
| Other Omega-3s | 200 mg | — | |
| Phosphatidylserine (PS) | 200 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel lists 1,800 mg EPA + DHA per serving (4 Softgels). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Taian aluofu wang luo ke ji you xian gong si (Limited Company (Ltd.); China) (OTHER) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews rose from 0 to 25 between March 7 and March 21, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 25, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how omega-3 have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-03-07 to 25 on 2026-03-21 (net +25). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…3RD PARTY TESTED QUALITY – Made with fish oil from anchovy, sardine, and mackerel, this rTG omega 3 supplement is third-party tested and manufactured under GMP standards” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…3RD PARTY TESTED QUALITY – Made with fish oil from anchovy, sardine, and mackerel, this rTG omega 3 supplement is third-party tested and manufactured under GMP standards” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…A high-potency fish oil formula designed for adults seeking targeted daily DHA and EPA nutritional support.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids # | shaded = doses used in studies (300 mg–1.8 g) · bar = this label | 2 g — above the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-463e58cb (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Arofum |
| Source listing identifier | B0GG3QX7FB |
| USPTO brand owner | Taian aluofu wang luo ke ji you xian gong si (Limited Company (Ltd.); China) · OTHER · China |
| Owner filed address | China); Tai shan qu cai yuan jie dao, meng xiang gu chan ye yuan 419 shi, Taian shi, 271000, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 4 Softgels |
| Servings per container | 75 |
| Pack statement | 300 SOFTGELS |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, 3RD PARTY TESTED, NSF, 3rd Party Tested |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 2.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 (as Pyridoxal-5-Phosphate) | 5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Omega-3 Fatty Acids # | 2000 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) | 1100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) | 700 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Other Omega-3s | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Phosphatidylserine (PS) | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Brain Support Formula” · “2,000 mg per serving” · “High DHA 1100 mg + EPA 700 mg” · “from anchovy, sardine & mackerel” · “+ Phosphatidylserine (PS)” · “Supports normal cognitive function and brain health*” · “Includes EPA, DHA in triglyceride form (rTG)” · “Less than 5 mg of Cholesterol per serving (<1% Daily Value)”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
omega-3 (EPA + DHA) — NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet · PubMed dose-response trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 684 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: research measures EPA and DHA together, not the weight of the fish-oil concentrate; the panel must expose those rows separately.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-463e58cb · built August 04, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai