full reportFull record · lc-487966f9 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 6 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Walnut (Juglans nigra) Extract (hulls) | 100 mg | — | |
| Wormwood (Artemisia annua ) Extract (aerial parts) | 100 mg | — | |
| Pumpkin Seed Extract (Cucurbita pepo) | 50 mg | — | |
| Clove Bud Extract | 50 mg | — | |
| Garlic Bulb Extract | 50 mg | — | |
| Oregano (Origanum vulgare) Extract (leaf) | 50 mg | — | |
| Proprietary Blend | 100 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The listing advertises “18-in-1”. The Supplement Facts panel publishes 7 amounts. The remaining ingredients may be present without a published amount. A count on the front of a pack is not the same as an amount on the back, and only the amount tells you how much you are getting.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Featuring key botanicals like Wormwood, Black Walnut, Clove, and more, our formula is third-party tested for purity and potency, making it perfect for vegetarians, vegan” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Benefit claim “…This powerful herbal blend supports deep gut cleansing, parasite detox, promote digestive balance for overall wellness.…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-487966f9 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | MIDDKUOO |
| Source listing identifier | B0GTSX993D |
| Retailer listing title | 18-in-1 Wormwood Black Walnut Clove Parasite Cleanse | Gut Cleanse & D… show full title18-in-1 Wormwood Black Walnut Clove Parasite Cleanse | Gut Cleanse & Detox ,Digestive Balance with Garlic, Turmeric, Pumpkin Seed, Oregano, Berberine | Soy-Free,Gentle Nourishing Gut Formula,300 ct |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Softgels |
| Servings per container | 100 |
| Pack statement | 300 Softgels |
| Badges printed on pack | 100% VEGAN, GLUTEN FREE, NON GMO, Premium Natural Ingredients, Science-Backed Formula, Gentle On The Stomach, High-Concentration, Liposomal Delivery |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Black Walnut (Juglans nigra) Extract (hulls) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Wormwood (Artemisia annua ) Extract (aerial parts) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pumpkin Seed Extract (Cucurbita pepo) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Clove Bud Extract | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Garlic Bulb Extract | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Oregano (Origanum vulgare) Extract (leaf) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Proprietary Blend | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“18-IN-1” · “PREMIUM HERBAL BLEND” · “VIRAL ON TIKTOK” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “18 IN 1 POWERFUL NATURAL” · “Carefully Selected & Scientifically Formulated” · “6,600MG per serving” · “18-IN-1 PREMIUM HERBAL BLEND”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record lc-487966f9 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai