Marketing check: 1 marketing claim needs attention, 2 remain partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
The listing uses 9 g for creatine. The panel lists creatine at 5 g; the other 4,000 mg is the rest of the declared blend. Panel addition: Creatine Monohydrate 5000 mg + BCAA 2:1:1 2000 mg + Beta-Alanine 1000 mg + L-Taurine 500 mg + L-Carnitine 500 mg = 9,000 mg. This documents the framing; it does not establish what is inside the product.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The declared contents leave too little room for the serving itself, or exceed its stated mass. At least one label number needs an explanation.
Declared contents total at least 12 g per 4-gummy serving: 9 g of major actives plus 3 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the decl…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingTemplate, translation, or duplicate-row artifacts are reasons to trust the printed numbers less until the brand supplies a clean, product-specific panel.
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Creatine Monohydrate appears twice: a unitless "12" row and a 5,000 mg row”; “The "% Daily | Value" header is split into two columns”; “The panel says "2.000 calorie diet"”; “The panel says "Sodium Citral"”; “The panel says "Serving P…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingMoist, acidic formats can reduce the active ingredient over time, so the delivered amount may be lower than the label says.
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.
569 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 28,450–56,900 units sold — for a brand about 14 months old. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown label. The count is a documented fact; the conclusion is yours.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingGradual growth is more ordinary; a sudden burst deserves a closer look. Neither pattern proves whether individual reviews are genuine.
Written reviews grew from 105 to 183 across 2026-01-25 – 2026-07-15 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~31).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingYou can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe number is worth noticing, but a large Daily Value is not by itself proof of harm or benefit.
The panel declares 25 mcg vitamin B12 (1000% Daily Value). NIH does not set a B12 UL for adults, but high-dose B12 can interfere with some laboratory tests. This is a documented dose context, not a safety verdict.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingUSPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
The panel declares 5 g per serving, in the 3–5 g/day context cited in the research.
Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.
Exact page checked on 2026-07-22.
View on Amazon ↗No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel declares 5 g creatine per serving, at the top of the commonly studied 3–5 g/day range. This compares declared label numbers with research; it does not verify contents or recommend an amount.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Wenjie Chen (INDIVIDUAL) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews grew from 105 to 183 across 2026-01-25 – 2026-07-15 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~31).
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The listing uses 9 g for creatine. The panel lists creatine at 5 g; the other 4,000 mg is the rest of the declared blend. Panel addition: Creatine Monohydrate 5000 mg + BCAA 2:1:1 2000 mg + Beta-Alanine 1000 mg + L-Taurine 500 mg + L-Carnitine 500 mg = 9,000 mg. This documents the framing; it does not establish what is inside the product.
Declared contents total at least 12 g per 4-gummy serving: 9 g of major actives plus 3 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the declared contents barely fit the format’s physics. The 2.5–3.5 g gummy assumption is not a measurement.
The panel carries these quoted observations: “Creatine Monohydrate appears twice: a unitless "12" row and a 5,000 mg row”; “The "% Daily | Value" header is split into two columns”; “The panel says "2.000 calorie diet"”; “The panel says "Sodium Citral"”; “The panel says "Serving Per Container"”. US-market labels are produced under cGMP controls; these are template or translation artifacts worth checking, not proof that the label is fabricated or that the product is unsafe.
The listing uses “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes creatine monohydrate’s effect to studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed).
569 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 28,450–56,900 units sold — for a brand about 14 months old. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown label. The count is a documented fact; the conclusion is yours.
The panel declares 25 mcg vitamin B12 (1000% Daily Value). NIH does not set a B12 UL for adults, but high-dose B12 can interfere with some laboratory tests. This is a documented dose context, not a safety verdict.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 105 on 2026-01-25 to 183 on 2026-07-15 (net +78). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Answered by the panel: 5 g of the 9 g headline is creatine. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.