LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedZHOU · observed 2026-07-21
Quick read · ZHOU

ZHOU Black Seed Oil Capsules

Marketing check: 1 remains partly or independently unverified.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

Marketing claims, checked

Does the marketing hold up?

Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.

?Couldn’t verify independently1

GMP or manufacturing-quality language

Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located.

Evidence →
Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Checks outIs the label honest?

Every declared ingredient has an amount · 3 quantified rows.

You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outWho is behind it?

Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)

A government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.

Evidence and sources

Label #286205 “Black Seed Oil” (ZHOU), entered 2023-06-22, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — ZHOU Nutrition Zhou, Inc., Park City, UT.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 1
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out02

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record

Label #286205 “Black Seed Oil” (ZHOU), entered 2023-06-22, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — ZHOU Nutrition Zhou, Inc., Park City, UT.

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing04

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 724 on 2026-01-23 to 813 on 2026-07-08 (net +89). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.