LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not published21st century healthcare · observed 2026-07-21
Quick read · 21st century healthcare

21ST CENTURY PSYLLIUM FIBER 400 MG (0.52 GM) CAPSULE…

Marketing check: 1 remains partly or independently unverified.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

Marketing claims, checked

Does the marketing hold up?

Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.

?Couldn’t verify independently1

“Third-party tested”

No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.

Evidence →
Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationAny trouble on the record?

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.

Evidence and sources

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Twenty-First Century Healthcare, Inc recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-05-07: “A small quantity of bottles of Vitamin D3 125 mcg ((5000 IU) 100 ct. were mislabeled as Vitamin D3 25 mcg (1000 IU). …

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outIs the label honest?

Every declared ingredient has an amount · 6 quantified rows.

You can compare each declared dose with research instead of guessing what is hidden inside a blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • Brand ownership is not settled in this record.
  • No dated review-history series is on file yet.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out01

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing07

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is retained, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. Under NSF/ANSI 173, NSF lists 21st Century HealthCare, Inc. products, but the retained registry result does not cover this exact SKU. IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

Certified by NSF — contents and contaminants checked

21st Century HealthCare, Inc. appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 0 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Twenty-First Century Healthcare, Inc recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-05-07: “A small quantity of bottles of Vitamin D3 125 mcg ((5000 IU) 100 ct. were mislabeled as Vitamin D3 25 mcg (1000 IU). Secondary labeling on the bottles (back label) is correctly labeled as Vitamin D3 125 mcg (5000 IU).” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “21st Century Vitamin D3 125 mcg (5000 IU) tablet, 100 count, UPC 7-40985-27431-6, 21st Century HealthCare, Inc., 2119 Wilson St., Tempe, AZ 85282” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Brand ownership record not retained

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.

Search “21st Century HealthCare, Inc.” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.