Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Meisbey Electrolyte Powder Packets – 32 Sticks Sugar Free…
Checked against public sources on September 1, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Worth a closer look
4 things about this listing line up in a way worth knowing.
- 113% of the written reviews arrived in a single month
- No working brand website was confirmed for this name
- The listing sits in a variation family, so its review count can be shared with other products
- No barcode is published, so this listing cannot be matched to outside records
Each of these is ordinary on its own, and none of them says the product is unsafe or that anyone acted dishonestly — we cannot know that. Together they are the kind of pattern a careful shopper would want to see in one place. Every point above is a public, checkable fact; the sources are below.
Does the marketing hold up?
Reviews went from 0 to 148 between March 14 and August 30, 2026 — 113% of them arrived in a single month. A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Calories | 10 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 240 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes 0g Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
| Calcium | 20 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 280 mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg |
| Vitamin B12 | 4.8 mcg |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg |
| Magnesium | 100 mg |
| Zinc | 1 mg |
| Manganese | 0.2 mg |
Printed on the package: NON-GMO · SOY FREE · VEGAN · DAIRY FREE · GLUTEN FREE · KETO FRIENDLY
We read 20 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Marketing language, not scored
Premium Fuel for Performance
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Reviews went from 0 to 148 between March 14 and August 30, 2026 — 113% of them arrived in a single month.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
The dated series runs from 0 written reviews on March 14, 2026 to 148 on August 30, 2026. Up to 167 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 113% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady climb is not.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its amount · 20 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Show the exact filed address in the full report
Zhuchang Town, Qixingguan District, No. 25, Group 1, Halang Village, Bijie, Guizhou, 551700, CHINAUSPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 100 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
The panel lists 1 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where you can check or buy it
Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.
Amazon
Submitted listingExact page checked on 2026-09-01.
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.