Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-61b5c508 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 1 listed row. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physta® Tongkat Ali Root Extract (Eurycoma longifolia Root Extract) | 200 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists MUHAMMAD SHAAHIDULLAH BIN SHAYAA (INDIVIDUAL) in MALAYSIA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
Published sources describe how tongkat ali have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: Eurycoma longifolia randomized trial, NIH NCCIH — Herbs at a glance.
FDA's health-fraud program documents sexual-enhancement products as the most common supplement category found to contain undeclared prescription-drug ingredients. This is a category-level documented fact from FDA's public database — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 6 on 2025-10-02 to 12 on 2026-08-07 (net +6). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…CLINICALLY STUDIED, BIOAVAILABLE EXTRACT: PHYSTA is a hot water-extracted, standardized, patented form of Tongkat Ali backed by more than 26 clinical trials and 3rd part” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Quality-testing claim “…CLINICALLY STUDIED, BIOAVAILABLE EXTRACT: PHYSTA is a hot water-extracted, standardized, patented form of Tongkat Ali backed by more than 26 clinical trials and 3rd part” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…CLEAN, SIMPLE & 3RD-PARTY TESTED: Non-GMO, vegan capsules, no fillers or artificial additives, and manufactured in a GMP-certified facility for quality you can trust.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…5% Eurycomanone Supports Strength, Energy and Healthy Testosterone (60 Count)…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Physta® Tongkat Ali Root Extract (Eurycoma l | shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–400 mg) · bar = this label | 200 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-61b5c508 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | AKARALI |
| Source listing identifier | B0B724WJT6 |
| Retailer listing title | AKARALI Tongkat Ali for Men Highly Concentrated US Patented Physta® Ex… show full titleAKARALI Tongkat Ali for Men Highly Concentrated US Patented Physta® Extraction Technology 1.5% Eurycomanone Supports Strength, Energy and Healthy Testosterone (60 Count) |
| USPTO brand owner | MUHAMMAD SHAAHIDULLAH BIN SHAYAA · INDIVIDUAL · MALAYSIA |
| Owner filed address | 95 JALAN SS3/41, PETALING JAYA,, SELANGOR,, 47300, MALAYSIA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1-2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Pack statement | 60 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | 3rd party tested by Eurofins Lab, Eurofins Lab, PURE & NATURAL, CLINICALLY TESTED SINCE 2003, GMP certified, ISO certified |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Physta® Tongkat Ali Root Extract (Eurycoma longifolia Root E | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“PURE & NATURAL” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Single origin handpicked Tongkat Ali” · “10x more potent with higher gains” · “MIT-formulated standardized extract” · “26 clinical trials for efficacy” · “Supports healthy testosterone levels” · “Highest eurycomanone 1.5% - 3%”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Official brand domain: akarali.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia) — PubMed search: Eurycoma longifolia randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Herbs at a glance · FDA — tainted sexual-enhancement products · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: extract standardization varies widely between products; a raw-powder milligram figure is not comparable to a standardized-extract dose used in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-61b5c508 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai