lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-65a0fce1 · back to the summary

EDBOBOU Strawberry Sugar-Free Electrolyte Powder | Zero Sugar

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-08-02

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

20listed rows
20separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 20 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories0
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Total Carbohydrate0 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes 0g Added Sugars0 g
Protein0 g
Calcium57 mg
Potassium260 mg
Vitamin C140 mg
vitamin B60.4 mg
Phosphorus80 mg
Magnesium110 mg
Zinc1 mg
Manganese0.2 mg
Chloride78 mg
Sodium55 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Xiamen Feifan Hua Technology Co., Ltd (OTHER) in China for the listing brand wordmark “EDBOBOU”. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product. The saved package uses a different brand name, so this owner record does not settle who owns that package branding.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Package brand differs from the listing brand

The exact product listing names “EDBOBOU,” while the saved package/panel image reads “EDOBOROU.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. Confirm the package identity before applying ownership or other brand-level records to this product.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing6

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 12 actives sum to 727 mg, which fits inside the ≈3,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

90 servings × 3 g = 270 g, matching the printed net weight 270 g (Net Wt. 9.52 oz (270g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…LAB TESTED PRACTICES…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Manufacturing claim
“…GMP…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…Strawberry Flavor Sugar-Free Electrolyte Supplement: Boost hydration, relieve fatigue, and enjoy convenient on-the-go use…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
110 mg — below the studied range
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)Studies typically use 3 g–10 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
1 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-65a0fce1 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandEDBOBOU
Source listing identifierB0GV3B6961
Retailer listing titleEDBOBOU Strawberry Sugar-Free Electrolyte Powder | Zero Sugar, Fast Hy…
show full title EDBOBOU Strawberry Sugar-Free Electrolyte Powder | Zero Sugar, Fast Hydration Supplement for Athletes & Daily Wellness 90 Servings
USPTO brand ownerXiamen Feifan Hua Technology Co., Ltd · OTHER · China
Owner filed addressRoom 310, No. 42,, Jiancaiyuan, Meilin Street, Tong'an District,, Xiamen City, 361000, CHINA

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Scoop (3g)
Servings per container90
Net weightNet Wt. 9.52 oz (270g)
Pack statement90 SERVINGS
Badges printed on packGMP, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, LAB TESTED PRACTICES, VEGAN FRIENDLY, GLUTEN FREE INGREDIENTS, Keto Friendly, NON-GMO, KETO FRIENDLY

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories0 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Trans Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Cholesterol0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes 0g Added Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium57 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium260 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C140 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
vitamin B60.4 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Phosphorus80 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium110 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Manganese0.2 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Chloride78 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium55 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“90 SERVINGS” · “10 Vitamins & Minerals” · “Hydration Drink Mix” · “STRAWBERRY FLAVOR” · “KEEPS YOU GOING STRONG DURING INTENSE SPORTS” · “LOADED WITH KEY ELECTROLYTES” · “RAPIDLY REPLENISH ELECTROLYTES LOST IN SWEAT,” · “POWER YOUR NEXT WORKOUT.”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

PhosphorusNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (13,233) · UL 4000 mg (adults 19-70)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

ManganeseNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,608) · UL 11 mg (adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record lc-65a0fce1 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai