full reportFull record · lc-67265bfe · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 0 separately ingredients with amounts and 4 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Billion CFU Probiotic Complex | 250 mg | — | |
| Digestive Enzyme Complex | 200 mg | — | |
| Organic Prebiotic Complex | 150 mg | — | |
| Fruit and Vegetable Complex | 50 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Label #293566 “Women's Raw Probiotic 100 Billion CFU” (Wholesome Wellness), entered 2023-10-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Distributor — Wholesome Wellness, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Written reviews rose from 4,070 to 4,074 between June 11 and July 9, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 4, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 4,143 on 2026-05-28 to 4,074 on 2026-07-09 (net -69). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…rity GMP Certified Made in the USA 3rd Party Lab Tested Vegan Non-GMO Gluten-Free” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Professional-endorsement claim “…A complete once daily probiotic supplement. Doctor Formulated Probiotic Supplement: Our one-a-day whole fo…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…f Quality & Safety: Made in the USA in a UL, GMP certified facility labs. Probiotic for women…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…pearls Assured Standard Of Quality & Safety: Made in the USA in a UL, GMP certified facility labs. Probio…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Organic Prebiotic Complex | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label | 150 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-67265bfe (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Wholesome Wellness |
| Source listing identifier | B0811P73BT |
| Retailer listing title | Wholesome Wellness Organic Raw Probiotics 100 Billion CFU, Dr Formulat… show full titleWholesome Wellness Organic Raw Probiotics 100 Billion CFU, Dr Formulated for Women and Men, Complete Adult Supplement with Prebiotics and Digestive Enzymes; 30 Capsules, Shelf Stable |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Capsule / Servings Per Container: 30 |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 30 VEGETABLE CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP Certified, Made in the USA, 3rd Party Lab Tested, Vegan, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| 100 Billion CFU Probiotic Complex | 250 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Digestive Enzyme Complex | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Prebiotic Complex | 150 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fruit and Vegetable Complex | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“100 BILLION CFU” · “34 STRAINS” · “With PREBIOTICS & DIGESTIVE ENZYMES” · “Shelf Stable” · “No Refrigeration Required” · “30 VEGETABLE CAPSULES” · “Pure, Raw and Verified” · “Doctor-Formulated”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry
serving: 2 Capsule(s) · contents: 60 Vegetable Capsule(s) · label #293566 at dsld.od.nih.gov
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Probiotic Complex | 250 mg |
| Women Health Complex | 200 mg |
| Digestive Enzyme Complex | 200 mg |
| Organic Prebiotic Complex | 150 mg |
| Fruit and Vegetable Complex | 50 mg |
mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Probiotic — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) — NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-67265bfe · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai