lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-699886a6 · back to the summary

Heliocare Advanced with Nicotinamide Antioxidant Supplement

1 concrete dimensions confirmed · 4 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 500 mg niacin (as nicotinamide) claim matches the panel

MARKETING500 mg — listing title
PANELNiacin (as Nicotinamide) 500 mg — same amountNiacin (as Nicotinamide) 500 mg + Fernblock® Polypodium leucotomos (Calaguala) extract (leaf) 240 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 500 mg of niacin (as nicotinamide), and the listing-image panel shows 500 mg niacin (as nicotinamide) 2 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Niacin (as Nicotinamide)500 mg
Fernblock® Polypodium leucotomos (Calaguala) extract (leaf)240 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing3

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?

Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.

2

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

4

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…tect Against the Aging Effects of Free Radic Clinically Proven Fernblock PLE Technology Non-Flushing Form o…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…d is not a replacement for topical sunscreen DERMATOLOGIST RECOMMENDED Use Daily to Support Skin Health and Help Ma…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“…Nicacin (vitamin B3) non-flush form to help improve the appearance of skin ANTIOXIDANT SUPPORT:…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-699886a6 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandHeliocare
Source listing identifierB07MH34HP4
Retailer listing titleHeliocare Advanced with Nicotinamide Antioxidant Supplement, 120 Capsu…
show full title Heliocare Advanced with Nicotinamide Antioxidant Supplement, 120 Capsules

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Capsules
Servings per container120
Pack statement120 VEGAN CAPSULES
Badges printed on packVEGAN, NO ARTIFICIAL DYES, GLUTEN FREE, NO PRESERVATIVES, SOY FREE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Niacin (as Nicotinamide)500 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Fernblock® Polypodium leucotomos (Calaguala) extract (leaf)240 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“DERMATOLOGIST RECOMMENDED” · “Use Daily to Support Skin Health and Help Maintain the Skin's Ability to Protect Against the Aging Effects of Free Radic” · “Clinically Proven Fernblock PLE Technology” · “Non-Flushing Form of Nicotinamide (Vitamin B3)” · “Clinically Proven” · “Gluten-Free” · “No Artificial Dyes” · “Vegan”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

A brand storefront was found, but no exact-product price was published or matched to this exact product at build time.

Official brand domain: heliocare.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record lc-699886a6 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai