lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-6ee1ef46 · back to the summary

Sports Research® Icelandic Astaxanthin 12mg w/Coconut Oil

1 concrete dimensions confirmed · 4 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Sports Research Corporation (CORPORATION) in CALIFORNIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Reviews accumulated gradually

Written reviews grew from 1266 to 1373 across 2026-02-06 – 2026-03-01 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~107).

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing3

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,252 on 2026-01-29 to 1,373 on 2026-03-01 (net +121). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?

It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.

3

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

4

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…& Trusted — Non-GMO, soy-free, gluten-free, third-party tested, and manufactured in a cGMP-compliant facili…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…mg per softgel gives you maximum antioxidant support in just one easy capsule per day (no need fo…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 0 of 6 public signals

· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-6ee1ef46 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandSports Research
Source listing identifierB07V574YYY
Retailer listing titleSports Research® Icelandic Astaxanthin 12mg w/Coconut Oil, 60 Softgels…
show full title Sports Research® Icelandic Astaxanthin 12mg w/Coconut Oil, 60 Softgels
USPTO brand ownerSports Research Corporation · CORPORATION · CALIFORNIA, USA
Owner filed address784 W. Channel St., San Pedro, California 90731, UNITED STATES

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Record lc-6ee1ef46 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai