lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-7af1a56a · back to the summary

Creatine Monohydrate Gummies for Men & Women - with BCAA

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Shirley Truong (INDIVIDUAL) in USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 57 to 78 between July 15, 2025 and July 12, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

Label math withheld — variant ambiguity

Multi-pack listing (pack of 2) — the stated weight may cover all packs, so per-serving mass can't be pinned. Arithmetic runs only when every number provably belongs to the same product size.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how collagen peptides, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.

No data

Gummy format note (applies to creatine gummies as a category)

Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 70 on 2025-07-08 to 78 on 2026-07-12 (net +8). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says distributed by: Envycure Nutritional Products, 620 S. Magnolia Ave Ste C Ontario, CA 91762 USA. USPTO names Shirley Truong as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…3RD PARTY TESTED”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Manufacturing claim
“…HIGH QUALITY: All of our supplement are manufactured, tested, and bottled in a GMP-certified factory for superior quality and consistency.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…ENERGY SUPPORT…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Collagen (from Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen Pe
shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label
500 mg — below the studied range
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
0.5 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-7af1a56a (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandEnvyCure
Source listing identifierB0CMD1MNS5
Retailer listing titleCreatine Monohydrate Gummies for Men & Women - with BCAA, Collagen Pep…
show full title Creatine Monohydrate Gummies for Men & Women - with BCAA, Collagen Peptides, L-Taurine, Vitamin B12, D3, Chewables Creatine Monohydrate 5g Per Serving, Natural Lemon Flavor, Sugar Free, 2 Pack
USPTO brand ownerShirley Truong · INDIVIDUAL · USA
Owner filed address620 S Magnolia Ave, Ontario, CALIFORNIA 91762, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size4 Gummies
Servings per container16
Pack statement60 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packGLUTEN FREE, SUGAR FREE, NO ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS, NON GMO, GELATIN FREE, FREE, SUGAR-FREE, 3RD PARTY TESTED

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Amount Per Serving16 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate4g 1%*High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars0g 0%*High
clearly legible in the photo
Calories5000mg †High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E (as DL-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate)1000mg †High
clearly legible in the photo
Biotin (as D-Biotin)500mg †High
clearly legible in the photo
Collagen (from Hydrolyzed Bovine Collagen Peptides)500mg †High
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium Citrate500mg 250%High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid)50mcg(200IU) †High
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)500mcg 20833%High
clearly legible in the photo
Folic Acid (as Folate)500mcg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“5000MG CREATINE per serving” · “with BCAA + L-Taurine + Collagen Peptides” · “SUGAR-FREE” · “Lemon Flavor” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “PREMIUM FORMULA” · “5000MG CREATINE” · “ENERGY SUPPORT”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

BiotinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,606) · no UL; high doses interfere with lab tests

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

FolateNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

collagen peptidesPubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record lc-7af1a56a · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai