“Support, Muscle Cramp Relief, Stress, Heart, Bone & Nerve”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedVccvaa · checked Jul 20, 2026 · on sale since Jul 15, 2025🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Bugooo Inc. · Colorado, USA
Quick read · Vccvaa
Magnesium Complex 700mg
Checked against public sources on July 20, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
120capsules · 60 servings
4.6 / 5rating at observation
2,742visible ratings
Worth a closer look
4 things about this listing line up in a way worth knowing.
- 2,742 ratings on a brand whose first claimed use is March 27, 2025, with the trademark registered February 24, 2026
- No working brand website was confirmed for this name
- The listing sits in a variation family, so its review count can be shared with other products
- No barcode is published, so this listing cannot be matched to outside records
Each of these is ordinary on its own, and none of them says the product is unsafe or that anyone acted dishonestly — we cannot know that. Together they are the kind of pattern a careful shopper would want to see in one place. Every point above is a public, checkable fact; the sources are below.
Does the marketing hold up?
2,742 ratings on a brand first claimed March 27, 2025. The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified11 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Bugooo Inc.corporation · Colorado, USA
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?No recalls on filea new listing has little record either way
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
2◖ partly confirmed1? couldn’t verify
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| MAGNESIUM | 700 mg |
|---|---|
| GLYCINATE | we could not read this line |
| CITRATE MALATE | we could not read this line |
| ASP AR TAT E GLUCONATE | we could not read this line |
| OXIDE | we could not read this line |
| ASCORBATE | we could not read this line |
| TAURATE | we could not read this line |
| LACTATE | we could not read this line |
| CARBONATE | we could not read this line |
| CHLORIDE | we could not read this line |
| OROTATE | we could not read this line |
Printed on the package: GMP · THIRD-PARTY TESTED
We read 11 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
“on digestion and suitable for daily use Tested for Quality & Purity: Manufactured in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested to ensure…”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“on digestion and suitable for daily use Tested for Quality & Purity: Manufactured in a GMP-certified facility and third-party tested to ensure…”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationCan you trust the review pattern?
2,742 ratings on a brand first claimed March 27, 2025.
The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.
Evidence and sources
2,742 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 137,100–274,200 units sold since the brand's first claimed use in March 27, 2025. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown label. The count is a documented fact; the conclusion is yours.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 552 to 878 between April 21 and August 31, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 552 to 878 between April 21 and August 31, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 128, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Bugooo Inc.Corporation · exact supplement-class mark for VCCVAA
Filed address
1610 29th Avenue Pl Ste 101, Greeley, Colorado 80634, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 700 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits above that range.
0studied 200 mg–420 mg
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Buying options
Where you can check or buy it
Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.
Amazon
Submitted listing$9.99
Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-09-01.
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.