Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-90e84f00 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 6 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Protein | 1 g | — | |
| Iron (naturally occuring) | 0.9 mg | — | |
| Potassium (naturally occuring) | 20 mg | — | |
| Chlorella | 1 g | — | |
| Spirulina | 1 g | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Written reviews rose from 0 to 2 between June 9 and August 4, 2026. No single 30-day window in the dated series shows a rise.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Good Natured Inc, Davaon Limited. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-06-09 to 2 on 2026-08-04 (net +2). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…The vegan spirulina and chlorella capsules support your body’s natural detox, energize you from within, and assist digestion.…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-90e84f00 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Good Natured |
| Source listing identifier | B0GTWGHPQG |
| Retailer listing title | Spirulina Chlorella Tablets - Spirulina Capsules - Chlorella Tablets 1… show full titleSpirulina Chlorella Tablets - Spirulina Capsules - Chlorella Tablets 1250 |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Good Natured Inc · CALIFORNIA, USA; UNITED KINGDOM · registration 5137574 · 848 N. Rainbow Blvd. #9022, Las Vegas, NEVADA 89107, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Davaon Limited · UNITED KINGDOM · registration 7437185 · Wisteria Grange Barn, Pikes End, Pinner, Middlesex, HA52EX, UNITED KINGDOM |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving size: 10 Tablets |
| Servings per container | 125 |
| Net weight | Net Wt: 8.8oz (250g) |
| Pack statement | 1250 Tablets |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan, Gluten Free, NO GMOs, NO Fillers, NO Preservatives, NO Binders, NO Pesticides, NO Artificial Colors/Flavors |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron (naturally occuring) | 0.9 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium (naturally occuring) | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Chlorella | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Spirulina | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“100% Premium Cracked Cell Wall” · “1250 Tablets” · “50/50 MIX” · “Dietary Supplement” · “Grown in Sunlight” · “Excipient Free” · “The Wonders of Chlorella & Spirulina” · “HIGH IN ANTIOXIDANTS”
Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-90e84f00 · built August 07, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai