Checked against public sources on September 3, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says distributed by: Santa Cruz Paleo Inc., Del Mar, CA 92014. USPTO names Santa Cruz Paleo Incorporated as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 0 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Sat. Fat | 0 g |
| Trans Fat | 0 g |
| Cholest. | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 800 mg |
| Total Carb | 2 g |
| Total Sugar | 0 g |
| Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Vit. D | 0 mcg |
| Calcium | 40 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potas. | 300 mg |
| Mag. | 60 mg |
Printed on the package: PALEO · KETO · SUGAR FREE · GLUTEN FREE · THIRD PARTY LAB TESTED · INGREDIENTS ARE NON-GMO
We read 15 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Superior Ingredients
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Written reviews rose from 0 to 99 between September 29, 2025 and August 26, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 18, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingFiled address
922 Lundy Ln, Los Altos, CALIFORNIA 94024, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Open related seller leads before buying, then confirm the flavor, count, and serving size. Their prices are visible, but LookCloser does not claim savings until the pages share a UPC/GTIN.
Exact page checked on 2026-09-03.
View on Amazon ↗Open the brand storefront to search manually.
No defensible same-product page was saved from the brand catalog.
Check brand website ↗No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Target ↗No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.