Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-970c9e73 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 16 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 3 Kcal | — | |
| Total Carbohydrates | 0.7 g | — | |
| Fiber | 0.53 g | — | |
| Protien | 0.11 g | — | |
| Fats | 0.02 g | — | |
| Organic Supergreen Blend: Spinach, Fenugreek, AloeVera, Wheatgrass, Spirulina, Chlorella, Ashwagandha, Barley Grass, Alfalfa, Moringa | 800 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C* | 80 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B3* | 14 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B5* | 5 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B6* | 1.9 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12* | 2.2 mcg | — | |
| Sodium | 303 mg | — | |
| Iron | 10 mg | — | |
| Zinc | 8 mg | — | |
| Maganese | 2 mg | — | |
| Selenium | 0.04 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how ashwagandha, prebiotic fiber, fenugreek, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 239 on 2025-07-19 to 241 on 2025-12-07 (net +2). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…CLINICALLY STUDIED INGREDIENTS…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP, Sugar Free, Gluten free, Non GMO…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…OVERALL HEALTH BENEFITS: Carefully curated with anti-inflammatory & antioxidant-rich superfoods that help boost immunity and helps in slowing down the signs of aging.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Organic Supergreen Blend: Spinach, Fenugreek | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label | 800 mg — above the studied range |
| Fiber | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label | 530 mg — below the studied range |
| Organic Supergreen Blend: Spinach, Fenugreek | shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label | 800 mg — above the studied range |
| Zinc | shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label | 8 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Documented cautions
Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-970c9e73 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | WELLBEING NUTRITION |
| Source listing identifier | B07YNK6V8G |
| Retailer listing title | WELLBEING NUTRITION Daily Greens | Natural Lemon and Lime Flavour | 15… show full titleWELLBEING NUTRITION Daily Greens | Natural Lemon and Lime Flavour | 15 Tablets 63g (2.22Ounce) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size - 1 Tablet |
| Servings per container | 15 |
| Net weight | Net Weight: 63 g |
| Pack statement | 15 EFFERVESCENT TABLETS |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, Sugar Free, Gluten free, Non GMO, MADE IN A FDA REGISTERED FACILITY, CLINICALLY STUDIED INGREDIENTS, USDA ORGANIC, ORGANIC |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 3 Kcal | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrates | 0.7 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fiber | 0.53 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protien | 0.11 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fats | 0.02 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Supergreen Blend: Spinach, Fenugreek, AloeVera, Whea | 800 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C* | 80 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B3* | 14 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B5* | 5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6* | 1.9 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12* | 2.2 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 303 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Zinc | 8 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Maganese | 2 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Selenium | 0.04 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“GREENS + VEGGIES” · “Natural Lemon & Lime Flavor” · “15 EFFERVESCENT TABLETS” · “NUTRACEUTICAL” · “Drop. Fizz. Sip.” · “Our Certifications” · “GMP, Sugar Free, Gluten free, Non GMO” · “Percent Daily Values as per ICMR Guidelines.”
Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store wellbeingnutrition.com: 132 supplement products (+90 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Pantothenic Acid — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Zinc — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)
Selenium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,481) · UL 400 mcg (adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) — NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.
fenugreek — PubMed search: fenugreek extract randomized controlled trial · NIH NCCIH — Fenugreek · ClinicalTrials.gov — 60 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied as a standardized extract over 8–12 weeks; may interact with blood-thinning and blood-sugar medication — documented interaction, not advice.
zinc — NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-970c9e73 · built August 09, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai