Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-9f6994fc · back to the summary
Cata-Kor NMN Supplement – 4-in-1 NAD Supplement with Quercetin | TMG | Resveratrol
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-09-01
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
4listed rows
4separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 4 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide | 500 mg | — | |
| Trimethylglycine | 250 mg | — | |
| Quercetin (from Sophora japonica Bud Extract) | 150 mg | — | |
| Resveratrol (from Polygonum cuspidatum Root Extract) | 100 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Reus Research, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in Delaware, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 0 to 374 between December 11, 2025 and August 27, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 54, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing and a related brand product page both claim third-party testing. Neither names the laboratory or links a product- or lot-specific report. The related page does not publish this record's UPC. Repeating the claim across two pages confirms the brand publishes it, not that testing occurred. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how NMN have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial, ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2025-12-11 to 374 on 2026-08-27 (net +374). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
4
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Resveratrol – NMNH Alternative – Supports Cellular Energy & NAD+ Level – 60 Capsules – Third-Party Tested (1 Pack)…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP FACILITY…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN THE USA FROM GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS: Manufactured and packaged in the United States from globally sourced ingredients.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…Resveratrol – NMNH Alternative – Supports Cellular Energy & NAD+ Level – 60 Capsules – Third-Party Tested (1 Pack)…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–1 g) · bar = this label | 500 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-9f6994fc (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Cata-Kor |
| Source listing identifier | B0FWGXBT3C |
| Retailer listing title | Cata-Kor NMN Supplement – 4-in-1 NAD Supplement with Quercetin | TMG |… show full titleCata-Kor NMN Supplement – 4-in-1 NAD Supplement with Quercetin | TMG | Resveratrol – NMNH Alternative – Supports Cellular Energy & NAD+ Level – 60 Capsules – Third-Party Tested (1 Pack) |
| USPTO brand owner | Reus Research, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · Delaware, USA |
| Owner filed address | 68 SE 6th St., Apt. 4110, Miami, Florida 33131, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | USA MADE, SOURCED GLOBALLY, NSF CERTIFIED, 3RD PARTY TESTED, USA MADE FROM GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIEN, GMP FACILITY, USA MADE *, NSF, CONTENTS CERTIFIED, Wheat |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Beta-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trimethylglycine | 250 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Quercetin (from Sophora japonica Bud Extract) | 150 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Resveratrol (from Polygonum cuspidatum Root Extract) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“NAD ALTERNATIVE” · “Supports Cellular Energy, NAD+ Levels*” · “4-IN-1” · “SYNERGISTIC FORMULA” · “NMN Supports NAD+ levels*” · “TMG Supports methylation balance*” · “QUERCETIN Supports cellular renewal*” · “RESVERATROL Supports SIRT1 activity*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)
Beta-Nicotinamid Moconucleatide, Quercetin, Trimethylglycine, Resveratrol
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store catakor.com: 15 supplement products — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
NMN (nicotinamide mononucleotide) — PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN · ClinicalTrials.gov — 39 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: trials report raised NAD+ blood markers; whether that produces anti-aging or energy outcomes people care about remains unsettled in humans.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-9f6994fc · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai