LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedLife Extension · observed 2026-07-21🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Life Extension Foundation, Inc. · ['FLORIDA, USA', 'FLORIDA, USA']
Quick read · Life Extension

Neuro-Mag Magnesium L-Threonate, Memory Health

Marketing check: 2 remain partly or independently unverified.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

90capsules · 30 servings
Marketing claims, checked

Does the marketing hold up?

Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.

Partly confirmed1

Advertised health or performance benefit

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →

?Couldn’t verify independently1

US manufacturing or origin language

“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.

Evidence →
Quick read · 0 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

What remains open 1
  • Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Life Extension Foundation, Inc.['Corporation', 'Corporation'] · exact supplement-class mark for LIFE EXTENSION
Registration3789340
Registered2010-05-18
AssignmentsYes

Filed address
3600 West Commercial Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FLORIDA 33309, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out01

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Life Extension Foundation, Inc. (['CORPORATION', 'CORPORATION']) in ['FLORIDA, USA', 'FLORIDA, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing03

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read

The current image extraction retained 2 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,984 on 2026-03-15 to 2,273 on 2026-04-14 (net +289). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.