lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-a9abd311 · back to the summary

Align Probiotic, Womens Dual Action, Vaginal Probiotics for Women

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 4 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

3listed rows
3separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 3 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Gut Health Probiotic: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum 35624™†10 mg
Feminine Health Probiotic Blend: Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14®†, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001™†33 mg
Feminine Health Botanical: Chaste Tree (Vitex-angus castus L.) berry extract42 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing5

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter and Gamble Company. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. The Procter & Gamble Company recalled a different product on March 24, 2022. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Align Digestive De-Stress Capsules 21ct bottle packaged in paper carton 12 cartons per case”. FDA recorded the reason as “Product failed micro testing. Firm sent product for destruction, but was redirected for sale through online store”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 248 on 2025-07-03 to 321 on 2026-07-23 (net +73). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Professional-endorsement claim
“…#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED PROBIOTIC BRAND.…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“Align Probiotic, Womens Dual Action, Vaginal Probiotics for Women, Womens Probiotic for Vaginal Health Support, with Probiotics for Digestive Health, 28 Probiotic Capsule”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-a9abd311 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandAlign
Source listing identifierB09NF7421C
Retailer listing titleAlign Probiotic, Womens Dual Action, Vaginal Probiotics for Women, Wom…
show full title Align Probiotic, Womens Dual Action, Vaginal Probiotics for Women, Womens Probiotic for Vaginal Health Support, with Probiotics for Digestive Health, 28 Probiotic Capsules
USPTO brand-owner recordThe Procter & Gamble Company · OHIO, USA · registration 3644851 · One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, OHIO 45202, UNITED STATES
USPTO brand-owner recordThe Procter and Gamble Company · OHIO, USA · registration 3172424 · One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, OHIO 45202, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Capsule
Servings per container28
Pack statement28 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packGluten Free, Vegetarian

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Gut Health Probiotic: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum 310 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Feminine Health Probiotic Blend: Lactobacillus acidophilus L33 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Feminine Health Botanical: Chaste Tree (Vitex-angus castus L42 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED PROBIOTIC BRAND” · “UNIQUE STRAIN DEVELOPED BY GASTROENTEROLOGISTS**” · “GUT HEALTH PROBIOTIC helps relieve occasional bloating, gas, and abdominal discomfort*” · “FEMININE HEALTH PROBIOTICS & BOTANICAL help support vaginal health & monthly mood balance*” · “PROBIOTIC DESIGNED FOR WOMEN” · “GLUTEN FREE” · “VEGETARIAN” · “NO REFRIGERATION REQUIRED”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

ProbioticNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record lc-a9abd311 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai