Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-ab01ea0b · back to the summary
NAD+ Resveratrol 910mg Supplement for Women & Men
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The front number is the blend total, not the named ingredient
MARKETING910 mg — listing title
PANELTrans-Resveratrol 160 mg + the other listed actives = 910 mgOntZNAD™ (providing β-NAD+ ≥250 mg) 500 mg + Quercetin Phytosome (Sophora japonica extract (flower) / Phospholipid complex Sunflower) 250 mg + Trans-Resveratrol 160 mg
blend totalWe did the comparison: the front label uses 910 mg, but the named ingredient trans-resveratrol is 160 mg on the panel. The remainder is the other listed actives.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| OntZNAD™ (providing β-NAD+ ≥250 mg) | 500 mg | — | |
| Quercetin Phytosome (Sophora japonica extract (flower) / Phospholipid complex Sunflower) | 250 mg | — | |
| Trans-Resveratrol | 160 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution3
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Headline number is a blend total, not one named ingredient
The listing uses 0.91 g for resveratrol. The panel lists resveratrol at 0.16 g; the other 750 mg is the rest of the listed blend. Panel addition: OntZNAD™ (providing β-NAD+ ≥250 mg) 500 mg + Quercetin Phytosome (Sophora japonica extract (flower) / Phospholipid complex Sunflower) 250 mg + Trans-Resveratrol 160 mg = 910 mg. This documents the framing; it does not establish what is inside the product.
Package brand differs from the listing brand
The exact product listing names “O NATURE . ZIRAN,” while the saved package/panel image reads “Nature.Zian.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. Confirm the package identity before applying ownership or other brand-level records to this product.
The listing says 910 mg of resveratrol; the panel says 160 mg
We could not find an explanation for the difference — no blend, extract ratio, compound form or multi-capsule serving accounts for it. You are getting 160 mg of resveratrol per serving. Worth asking the brand which number describes the capsule you swallow.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
Brand ownership record not saved
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: 0.16 g of the 0.91 g headline is resveratrol. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
2
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…our body's true vitality. QUALITY APPROVED - GMP-certified, non-GMO, Gluten-free, and does no…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…RIBOSIDE SUPPLEMENT - Nicotinamide Riboside increases cellular levels of Nicotinamide Riboside plu…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-ab01ea0b (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | O NATURE . ZIRAN |
| Source listing identifier | B0DQGXL68G |
| Retailer listing title | NAD+ Resveratrol 910mg Supplement for Women & Men - 120 Capsules (120 … show full titleNAD+ Resveratrol 910mg Supplement for Women & Men - 120 Capsules (120 Count (Pack of 1)) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Capsules; Servings Per Container: 60 |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Pack statement | 125 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | VEGAN-FRIENDLY, NON-GMO, SUGAR-FREE, GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICE |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| OntZNAD™ (providing β-NAD+ ≥250 mg) | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Quercetin Phytosome (Sophora japonica extract (flower) / Pho | 250 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trans-Resveratrol | 160 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Supports NAD Levels*” · “Healthy Skin Aging*” · “Healthy Cellular Function*” · “CELL-LEVEL STRONG ABSORPTION...” · “Promotes Healthy Skin Aging*” · “Enhances Cellular Function*” · “Boosts Brain Health*” · “UNLOCK ADVANCED CELLULAR HEALTH”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record lc-ab01ea0b · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai