Advertised health or performance benefit
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedLoroc'e · observed 2026-07-23🇨🇳 USPTO wordmark owner · Quanzhou Jihai E-commerce Co., Ltd. · China
Quick read · Loroc'e
UltraGut GLP-1 Booster Fiber Mix Drink
Marketing check: 1 remains partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
30stick · 30 servings
4.4 / 5rating at observation
249visible ratings
Marketing claims, checked
Does the marketing hold up?
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
◐Partly confirmed1
Quick read · 3 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationAny trouble on the record?
Category context: weight-loss products carry documented FDA risk
This is category history, not proof about this product, but it changes how much unsupported claims deserve to be trusted.
Evidence and sources
FDA's health-fraud program lists weight-loss products among the top supplement categories found to contain undeclared drug ingredients. Category-level documented fact — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews accumulated gradually
Gradual growth is more ordinary; a sudden burst deserves a closer look. Neither pattern proves whether individual reviews are genuine.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews grew from 13 to 140 across 2026-05-04 – 2026-07-20 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~117).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWho owns the brand wordmark?
🇨🇳
Quanzhou Jihai E-commerce Co., Ltd.Other · exact supplement-class mark for LOROC'E
Filed address
1-602, Kaiyuan Bldg, No.9 Tangcuo Ave., Tangcuo Village, Chidian Tn., Jinjiang, Quanzhou, Fujian, 362212, CHINA
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
Buying options
Where you can check or buy it
Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.
Amazon
Submitted listing$35.02
Exact page checked on 2026-07-23.
View on Amazon ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out02
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Quanzhou Jihai E-commerce Co., Ltd. (OTHER) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 13 to 140 across 2026-05-04 – 2026-07-20 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~117).
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 6 actives sum to 190 mg, which fits inside the ≈4,500 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
30 servings × 4.5 g = 135 g, matching the printed net weight 135 g (Net Wt. 4.8oz (135g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how magnesium, ashwagandha have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
This category has documented FDA fraud risk
FDA's health-fraud program lists weight-loss products among the top supplement categories found to contain undeclared drug ingredients. Category-level documented fact — not a test result for this specific product. Source: fda.gov (linked in Related research).
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 13 on 2026-05-04 to 140 on 2026-07-20 (net +127). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.