USPTO identity
2 brand-owner records are on file
Exact supplement-related registrations are shown rather than choosing one by similarity: ALLSEASON ENTERPRISES LLC, ALLSEASON IPCO, LLC.
Start with the question · Clean Nutraceuticals
Clean Nutra Organic Maca Root Liquid Drops with Ashwagandha
Clean Adaptodrive™ Blend publishes one combined total, not its individual ingredient doses.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
What this means for you · Start with the question
Why this deserves a closer look
The panel lists “Clean Adaptodrive™ Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
6declared rows
5separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 5 separately quantified rows and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Adaptodrive™ Blend | 50 mg | — | |
| Organic Maca (Lepidium meyenii) Extract 30:1 (Root) | 100 mg | — | |
| Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) Extract 10:1 (Root) | 100 mg | — | |
| Organic Beet (Beta vulgaris) Extract 30:1 (Root) | 100 mg | — | |
| L-Arginine | 50 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those declared amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Public ownership records
The brand has 2 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸ALLSEASON ENTERPRISES LLC
SOUTH DAKOTA, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 7031117
Ste 214-1619, 401 E 8th St, Sioux Falls, SOUTH DAKOTA 57103, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements in the form of powder; Dietary supplements consisting primarily of vitamins; Food supplements; Green coffee bean extracts for use as dietary supplements; Gummy vitamins; Herbal supplements; Mineral supplements; Mineral nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements in the form of drink mixes; Protein supplements; Vitamin preparations; Vitamin supplements; Liquid vitamin supplements.
🇺🇸ALLSEASON IPCO, LLC
DELAWARE, USA · Registration 7942428
7582 Las Vegas Blvd. S., #3015, Las Vegas, Nevada 89123, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Dietary supplements; Dietary supplements consisting primarily of vitamins; Dietary supplements in the form of powder; Food supplements; Green coffee bean extracts for use as dietary supplements; Gummy vitamins; Herbal supplements; Liquid vitamin supplements; Mineral supplements; Mineral nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements; Nutritional supplements in the form of drink mixes; Protein supplements; Vitamin preparations; Vitamin supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.
Review history
–/ 5
not shownvisible ratings
Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 420 to 548 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.
Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
What would settle the biggest open question?
What would resolve: Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation? Evidence that would settle it: additional identity-bound public documentation.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out00
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing06
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: ALLSEASON ENTERPRISES LLC, ALLSEASON IPCO, LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation
Our image read produced 30 × 60 g = 1800 g versus net weight 60 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 6 actives sum to 450 mg, which fits inside the ≈60,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, ashwagandha, tongkat ali, fenugreek have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 420 on 2026-01-24 to 548 on 2026-07-13 (net +128). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.