lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-b192869a · back to the summary

AZO Cranberry Supplement, Made with Concentrated Whole Fruit Cranberry Powder to Help Cl…

0 concrete dimensions confirmed · 5 still open · built July 22, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-21

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

No data yet: Label math could not be verified

The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 3,258 on 2026-01-26 to 1 on 2026-07-13 (net -3,257). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

i

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…et FDA guidelines for gluten-free. MADE WITH CLINICALLY PROVEN PACRAN, a super-concentrated whole fruit cra…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…* Reduced Risk of Recurring UTIs FROM THE #1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BRAND~ Less UTIs #1 URINARY HEALTH BRAND may…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Speed-of-results claim
“…en. CONVENIENT, EASY TO SWALLOW SOFTGELS are fast acting and specifically formulated to help maintain…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a study measuring the stated outcome over the stated time
No study measuring the stated outcome over the stated timeframe was located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…the urinary tract.* Plus Vitamin C, to help promote immune system function.* Made with Clinicall…”
Not assessed
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not assessed — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 0 of 6 public signals

· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Supplement Facts visible in photos — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-b192869a (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandAZO
Source listing identifierB004RR1FF6
Retailer listing titleAZO Cranberry Supplement, Made with Concentrated Whole Fruit Cranberry…
show full title AZO Cranberry Supplement, Made with Concentrated Whole Fruit Cranberry Powder to Help Cleanse and Protect the Urinary Tract*, Sugar Free Cranberry Pills, Non-GMO, 100 Softgels

From the label (photo-read)

Pack statement100 Softgels

No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.

Claims printed on the packaging:

“HELPS CLEANSE & PROTECT*” · “Reduced Risk of Recurring UTIs” · “FROM THE #1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BRAND~” · “Less UTIs” · “#1 URINARY HEALTH BRAND” · “may help Reduce the Risk of Recurring UTIs in Healthy Women” · “A super concentrated whole fruit cranberry powder clinically proven to help cleanse and protect the urinary tract.*” · “Plus Vitamin C, to help promote immune system function.*”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Record lc-b192869a · built July 22, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai