lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · lc-b5429378 · back to the summary

Natures aid Sugar-Free Vitamin D3 K2 Gummies with Calcium + K2 (MK-7)

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

10listed rows
10separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 10 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Total Carbohydrates3
Total Sugar0g
Includes Added Sugar0g
Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol from Lichen)250mcg(1000IU)
Vitamin K2 (Menaquinone as Mk-7 from Natto)200mcg
Calcium (as Calcium Citrate)500mg
Magnesium (as Magnesium Citrate)50mg
Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid)120mg
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)11mg
Sodium15mg

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Hefei Wandanyou Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) (OTHER) in CHINA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 25 to 40 between July 3, 2025 and July 24, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 7, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing5

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 34 on 2025-06-24 to 40 on 2026-07-24 (net +6). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…GMP CERTIFIED”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…This process helps promote strong healthy bones, joint and teethes & muscles.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium (as Magnesium Citrate)
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
50 mg — below the studied range
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
11 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals

✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

LookCloser record IDlc-b5429378 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking)
BrandNatures aid
Source listing identifierB0DGSJ356S
Retailer listing titleNatures aid Sugar-Free Vitamin D3 K2 Gummies with Calcium + K2 (MK-7),…
show full title Natures aid Sugar-Free Vitamin D3 K2 Gummies with Calcium + K2 (MK-7), Magnesium Citrate, Vitamin C, Extra Strength - Ultimate Absorption for Bone Muscle Teeth Immune, Vegan - 120 Gummies
USPTO brand ownerHefei Wandanyou Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) · OTHER · CHINA
Owner filed addressCHINA); Room 328, Shuangying Avenue, No. 777 Yulan Avenue, High-tech Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230000, CHINA

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Gummies
Servings per container30
Pack statement60 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packSUGAR FREE, HEALTHY, GLUTEN FREE, VEGAN, NON GMO, SOY FREE, GMP CERTIFIED

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Total Carbohydrates3 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugar0g High
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugar0g High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol from Lichen)250mcg(1000IU) High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K2 (Menaquinone as Mk-7 from Natto)200mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium (as Calcium Citrate)500mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium (as Magnesium Citrate)50mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid)120mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)11mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium15mg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “10000IU + 200MCG” · “COMBINED WITH CALCIUM CITRATE 500MG MAGNESIUM + VITAMIN C & ZINC” · “NATURAL FRUIT FLAVOR” · “HEALTHY NATURAL FORMULA” · “250 mcg Vitamin D3” · “200 mcg Vitamin K2” · “500 mg Calcium Citrate”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record lc-b5429378 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai