full reportFull record · lc-b5fc3a1a · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 600 mg of dha [c22:6 n-3] as tg, and the listing-image panel shows 600 mg dha [c22:6 n-3] as tg serving size: 2 softgels. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories (energy) | 30 | — | |
| Calories from fat | 27 | — | |
| Total Fat | 3 g | — | |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 2 g | — | |
| Cholesterol | 5 mg | — | |
| Total Omega-3 | 1,600 mg | — | |
| EPA [C20:5 n-3] as TG | 900 mg | — | |
| DHA [C22:6 n-3] as TG | 600 mg | — | |
| Other Total Omega-3 fatty acids as TG | 100 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel lists 1,500 mg EPA + DHA per serving (Serving Size: 2 Softgels). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.
A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Fortify Vitamins, Inc. (CORPORATION) in FLORIDA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews rose from 126 to 129 between January 12 and June 16, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 1, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how omega-3 have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet, PubMed dose-response trial.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 124 on 2025-09-26 to 129 on 2026-06-16 (net +5). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…Clinically Tested…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Quality-testing claim “…PURE, SAFE, AND DOCTOR-RECOMMENDED: Expertly Concentrated & Purified in Norway under NSF and cGMP standards, this rTG form omega 3 supplement for men and women is third-” | Partly supported We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis. |
| Professional-endorsement claim “…PURE, SAFE, AND DOCTOR-RECOMMENDED: Expertly Concentrated & Purified in Norway under NSF and cGMP standards, this rTG form omega 3 supplement for men and women is third-” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Fortifeye Vitamins triple-strength blend supports eye comfort, cardiovascular health, cognitive performance, and joint flexibility.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Total Omega-3 | shaded = doses used in studies (300 mg–1.8 g) · bar = this label | 1.6 g — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-b5fc3a1a (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Fortifeye Vitamins |
| Source listing identifier | B01N7G2D9K |
| Retailer listing title | Fortifeye Super Omega-3 Fish Oil - 60 Count - 1600mg EPA + DHA - Tripl… show full titleFortifeye Super Omega-3 Fish Oil - 60 Count - 1600mg EPA + DHA - Triple Strength Ultra-Pure rTG Omega-3 Expertly Concentrated & Purified in Norway from Sustainably Sourced Wild Fish - Lemon Flavor |
| USPTO brand owner | Fortify Vitamins, Inc. · CORPORATION · FLORIDA, USA |
| Owner filed address | 951 South Bayshore Blvd., Safety Harbor, FLORIDA 34695, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 2 Softgels |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 SOFTGELS |
| Badges printed on pack | PHYSICIAN RECOMMENDED, NSF, GMP, Produced in Norway, PRODUCT OF NORWAY, Sustainably Sourced, cGMP, Sourced from a GMP Certified Facility |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories (energy) | 30 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calories from fat | 27 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 3 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Cholesterol | 5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Omega-3 | 1,600 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| EPA [C20:5 n-3] as TG | 900 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| DHA [C22:6 n-3] as TG | 600 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Other Total Omega-3 fatty acids as TG | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“1600mg EPA+DHA Per Serving” · “Superior Absorption” · “Full-Body Support” · “Clinically Tested” · “No Fishy Aftertaste” · “High Potency/Triple Strength 900 EPA / 600 DHA” · “Pure Omega-3 Support for Total Body Wellness” · “Absorbs up to 3x better for stronger results in heart, brain, eyes & joints”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Omega-3 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (14,320) · FDA: <5 g/day EPA+DHA from supplements
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
omega-3 (EPA + DHA) — NIH ODS — Omega-3 Fatty Acids fact sheet · PubMed dose-response trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 684 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: research measures EPA and DHA together, not the weight of the fish-oil concentrate; the panel must expose those rows separately.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-b5fc3a1a · built August 14, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai