The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 0 to 21 between June 15 and August 4, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 20, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Full record · lc-c7663d59 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Written reviews rose from 0 to 21 between June 15 and August 4, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 20, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-06-15 to 21 on 2026-08-04 (net +21). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?
It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “Omega 3 Fish Oil 4200mg, Triple Strength 1200mg EPA & 900mg DHA, Wild Caught Norwegian Fish, Enteric Coated, No Fishy Burps, Lemon Flavor, Supports Heart, Brain & Joint H” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 1 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-c7663d59 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | AIQIUSHA |
| Source listing identifier | B0H3TTFBGH |
| Retailer listing title | Omega 3 Fish Oil 4200mg, Triple Strength 1200mg EPA & 900mg DHA, Wild … show full titleOmega 3 Fish Oil 4200mg, Triple Strength 1200mg EPA & 900mg DHA, Wild Caught Norwegian Fish, Enteric Coated, No Fishy Burps, Lemon Flavor, Supports Heart, Brain & Joint Health, 240 Softgels, 2 Pack |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 4200 mg PER SERVING |
| Pack statement | 24 SOFTGELS |
| Badges printed on pack | GMO FREE, GLUTEN FREE, WILD CAUGHT, DEEP SEA, OMEGA 3, EPA, DHA, MERCURY FREE FORMULA |
No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.
Claims printed on the packaging:
“MAX STRENGTH” · “1200 mg EPA + 900 mg DHA” · “Lemon Flavor” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Essential Omega-3 for Everyday Balance” · “Supports memory, visual function, and brain health for daily study support.” · “Supports joint comfort, mental alertness, and focus.” · “Supports mood balance, stress response, and energy.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record lc-c7663d59 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai