LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedDr. Berg Nutritionals · observed 2026-07-23Package says distributed by: Dr. Eric Berg DC · 4501 Ford Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22302
Quick read · Dr. Berg Nutritionals

Dr. Berg Zero Sugar Hydration Keto Electrolyte…

Marketing check: 1 marketing claim needs attention, 1 checks out, 1 remains partly or independently unverified.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

Marketing claims, checked

Does the marketing hold up?

Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.

Checks out1

POTASSIUM · 1,000 mg per serving

The same-name panel row declares 1,000 mg per serving, matching the 1,000 mg listing claim.

Evidence →

Partly confirmed1

Advertised health or performance benefit

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →

Claimed without support found1

Results promised within a stated time

No study measuring the stated outcome over the stated timeframe was located for this product.

Evidence →
Quick read · 3 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationAny trouble on the record?

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.

Evidence and sources

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specif…

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Needs explanationIs the label honest?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend

A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.

Evidence and sources

The panel lists “Trace mineral complex” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Checks outWho is behind it?

Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)

A government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.

Evidence and sources

Label #238774 “Dr. Berg's Electrolyte Powder Raspberry & Lemon Natural Flavor” (Dr. Berg Nutritionals), entered 2020-12-26, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Manu…

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out01

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record

Label #238774 “Dr. Berg's Electrolyte Powder Raspberry & Lemon Natural Flavor” (Dr. Berg Nutritionals), entered 2020-12-26, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Manufacturer — Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Alexandria, VA.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution01

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend

The panel lists “Trace mineral complex” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing06

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 6 actives sum to 1,317 mg, which fits inside the ≈7,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

50 servings × 7 g = 350 g, matching the printed net weight 325 g (Net wt 11.46 oz (325 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specifications .” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Liquid Vitamin D with Zinc Dietary Supplement ( Liquid Vitamin D ), Individual 1 FL OZ bottle (with no secondary packaging), Glass bottle. The label of t” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 2,427 on 2026-02-02 to 2,481 on 2026-07-11 (net +54). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?

The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.

2

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.