LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedNextdia · checked Aug 16, 2026 · on sale since Apr 16, 2026🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Shirley Truong · USA
Quick read · Nextdia

Toddler 2-3 & Teen Kids Vitamin D3 K2 + Calcium 500mg / 250mg…

Checked against public sources on August 16, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

60gummies
60servings per container

Does the marketing hold up?

The label says 2.3 g of calcium in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh. That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.

Is the dose real?!Label says 500 mg · panel says 250 mg
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Shirley Truongindividual · USA
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

2◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Gummy · 60 servings per container

Calories8
Total Fat0.2 g
Total Carbohydrate1.5 g
Total Sugar0 g
Includes Added Sugar0 g
Vitamin A (as Beta-Carotene)300 mcg RAE
Natural Vitamin C (from Organic Acerola Cherry)30 mg
Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol from Lichen)25 mcg (1000 IU)
Vitamin K2 (as MK-7 Menaquinone from Chickpea)30 mcg
Elemental Calcium (from Red Marine Algae [Lithothamnion sp.])250 mg
Elemental Magnesium (from Red Marine Algae [Lithothamnion sp.])30 mg
Zinc (as Zinc Glycinate)5 mg
Immune Proprietary Blend (Elderberry Extract (Fruit) (10:1), Echinacea Purpurea (Root) Extract (10:1))300 mg
Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids (from Algal Oils)150 mg
DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid)100 mg
EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid)50 mg
Liposomal Proprietary Blend (Phosphatidylcholine from Organic Non-GMO Sunflower Oil and Lecithin)50 mg

Printed on the package: Sugar Free · AMERICAN PRODUCT PREMIUM QUALITY · GMP · GMP CERTIFIED · GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES · NO GELATIN · Non-GMO

We read 17 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed2

“GMP”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →
“Vitamin D3 K2 Gummies for Growing Kids Made for toddlers, kids & teens, these Vitamin D3 K2 gummies support bone & immune”

The panel lists 150 mg EPA + DHA per serving (1 Gummy). One randomized dose-response trial used 300–1,800 mg/day; omega-3 studies vary widely. This is research context, not a recommendation or safety verdict.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationIs the label honest?

The label says 2.3 g of calcium in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh

That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.

Evidence and sources

A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 2,300 mg — 2.3 g — of calcium in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of…

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Needs explanationIs the label honest?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Immune Proprietary Blend (Elderberry Extract (Fruit) (10:1),”

A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.

Evidence and sources

The panel lists “Immune Proprietary Blend (Elderberry Extract (Fruit) (10:1),” (300 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • No dated review-history series is on file yet.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Shirley TruongIndividual · exact supplement-class mark for NEXTDIA
Registration7119930
Registered2023-07-25
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded
Show the exact filed address in the full report
620 S Magnolia Ave, Ontario, CALIFORNIA 91762, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.

Dose vs research

EPA + DHA

150 mg per serving — below the 300–1800 mg/day used in the linked studies.

Linked ingredient research · label amount, not a recommendation
Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 100 mg of omega-3 (EPA + DHA) per serving. Studies we found used 300 mg–1.8 g a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 300 mg–1.8 g

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

The panel lists 30 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 200 mg–420 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

The panel lists 5 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 8 mg–40 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Buying options

Where you can check or buy it

Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.

Amazon

Submitted listing
$26.49

Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-08-16.

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Walmart ↗

Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 16, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.