full reportFull record · lc-dae72f64 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: HUMAN POWER OF N COMPANY, INC., Human Power of N Company. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 8,869 on 2025-07-28 to 9,530 on 2026-08-23 (net +661). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?
It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…SUPPORT BLOOD PRESSURE & ENERGY: SuperBeets Heart Chews are powered by clinically studied Grape Seed Extract to support healthy blood pressure.…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
| Benefit claim “HumanN SuperBeets Heart Chews, Beet Root Powder Support Energy Supplement, Nitric Oxide and Blood Pressure Support, Grape Seed Extract & Non-GMO, Heart Health, Pomegranat” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 1 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-dae72f64 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | HumanN |
| Source listing identifier | B07SRK1F3Y |
| Retailer listing title | HumanN SuperBeets Heart Chews, Beet Root Powder Support Energy Supplem… show full titleHumanN SuperBeets Heart Chews, Beet Root Powder Support Energy Supplement, Nitric Oxide and Blood Pressure Support, Grape Seed Extract & Non-GMO, Heart Health, Pomegranate Berry Flavor, 60 Count |
| USPTO brand-owner record | HUMAN POWER OF N COMPANY, INC. · TEXAS, USA · registration 5351133 · 1120 S. CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY, BUILDING 1, SUITE 210, AUSITN, TEXAS 78746, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Human Power of N Company · Texas, USA · registration not stated · 1250 S CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY, BLDG 1 SUITE 300, Austin, Texas 78746, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Pack statement | 60 Chews |
| Badges printed on pack | NON-GMO, NON-GMO BEETROOT, NON GMO, DIETARY SUPPLEMENT |
No Supplement Facts panel appears in the listing photos — the full per-ingredient table isn't shown to buyers before purchase. Recorded as a transparency gap, not a strike.
Claims printed on the packaging:
“The Original Heart Chew” · “Beetroot and clinically studied French grape seed extract for healthy blood pressure support and daily energy.” · “Pomegranate Berry Flavor” · “#1 Cardiologist recommended beet brand for heart health support²” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “NEARLY 2X more effective blood pressure support¹” · “from clinically researched grape seed extract” · “SUPPORTS HEALTHY BLOOD PRESSURE”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store humann.com: 29 supplement products (+5 merch items) — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record lc-dae72f64 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai