full reportFull record · lc-eb8405fb · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 8 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 3g | — | |
| Vitamin D (as Cholecalciferol) | 20mcg 100% | — | |
| Calcium (as Tricalcium Phosphate) | 300mg 23% | — | |
| Phosphorus (as Tricalcium Phosphate) | 150mg 12% | — | |
| Sodium | 15mg <1% | — | |
| Proprietary Growth Blend† | 113.02mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists Vanilla Chip, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CALIFORNIA, USA; NEVADA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 731 on 2025-07-29 to 828 on 2026-08-27 (net +97). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Professional-endorsement claim “…PEDIATRICIAN #1 RECOMMENDED…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Manufacturing claim “…* USA GMP CERTIFIED FACILITY: TruHeight is made in a USA GMP certified facility with global ingredients under strict regulatory standards.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…Made in USA” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…Vitamins D3 and K2 promote calcium absorption in the gut and maintain adequate serum calcium and phosphate concentrations to enable healthy bone mineralization.…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-eb8405fb (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | ProHeight |
| Source listing identifier | B087QR7D1H |
| Retailer listing title | TruHeight Growth Gummies (Watermelon) Tall Nutrition for Natural Growt… show full titleTruHeight Growth Gummies (Watermelon) Tall Nutrition for Natural Growth Supplement for Kids & Teens - Vitamin D, K, Calcium & Ashwagandha, Bone Strength Vitamins D3 K2, Picky Eater, Taller Ages 5+ |
| USPTO brand owner | Vanilla Chip, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CALIFORNIA, USA; NEVADA, USA |
| Owner filed address | 740 Santree Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada 89110, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 2 Gummies |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 Gummies |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, PEDIATRICIAN #1 RECOMMENDED, Made in USA |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 3g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin D (as Cholecalciferol) | 20mcg 100% | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium (as Tricalcium Phosphate) | 300mg 23% | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Phosphorus (as Tricalcium Phosphate) | 150mg 12% | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 15mg <1% | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Proprietary Growth Blend† | 113.02mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Supports Bone Growth & Development†” · “For Ages 5+” · “#1 Pediatrician Recommended” · “Brand for Growth & Development” · “Supports Bone Growth” · “Dietary Supplement” · “Watermelon Flavor” · “This unique formula stimulates bone growth,”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Phosphorus — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (13,233) · UL 4000 mg (adults 19-70)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-eb8405fb · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai