Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Peng, Xiaoli (INDIVIDUAL; CORPORATION) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-f23e5824 · back to the summary
NMN Supplement 1000mg, Resveratrol, CoQ10, Glutathione
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-08-02
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 900 mg nmn (β-nicotinamide mononucleotide) claim matches the panel
MARKETING900 mg — listing title
PANELNMN (β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) 900 mg — same amountNMN (β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) 900 mg + Proprietary antioxidant blend 100 mg
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 900 mg of nmn (β-nicotinamide mononucleotide), and the listing-image panel shows 900 mg nmn (β-nicotinamide mononucleotide) serving size: 2 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMN (β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) | 900 mg | — | |
| Proprietary antioxidant blend | 100 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Review-count history: not available
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how NMN have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial, ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP compliant…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Boost Energy & Vitality: Our NMN supplement delivers 1000mg per serving — 900mg of pure β-NMN combined with 100mg of a proprietary 5-ingredient antioxidant blend — suppo” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| NMN (β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) | shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–1 g) · bar = this label | 900 mg — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-f23e5824 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | XRAOW |
| Source listing identifier | B0GYCQBPL7 |
| Retailer listing title | NMN Supplement 1000mg, Resveratrol, CoQ10, Glutathione, Curcumin & Saf… show full titleNMN Supplement 1000mg, Resveratrol, CoQ10, Glutathione, Curcumin & Saffron |
| USPTO brand owner | Peng, Xiaoli · INDIVIDUAL; CORPORATION · China |
| Owner filed address | Baima Town, Shizhong District, No. 25, Attached to No. 2, Lianhe Vill, Neijiang, Sichuan, 641000, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan, GMP compliant, Gluten-Free, Vegan-Friendly Formula, Gluten Free, Satisfaction 100% Guarantee, Good Manufacturing Practice GMP Certifie |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| NMN (β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide) | 900 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Proprietary antioxidant blend | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Boosts Energy Metabolism*” · “Anti-aging Dna Repair*” · “NMN Supplement 1000mg Per Serving” · “6-in-1 formula contains β-nicotinamide mononucleotide” · “Each bottle contains 1000mg β-NMN” · “ADVANCED FORMULA” · “6-IN-1 NMN COMPLEX” · “High Potency | Comprehensive Antioxidant Support”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Related research & consistency
NMN (nicotinamide mononucleotide) — PubMed search: nicotinamide mononucleotide human trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — NMN · ClinicalTrials.gov — 39 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: trials report raised NAD+ blood markers; whether that produces anti-aging or energy outcomes people care about remains unsettled in humans.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-f23e5824 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai