Exact product checked · GTIN 00195515033398Amazon Basics · checked Jul 25, 2026 · on sale since May 23, 2018🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Amazon Technologies, Inc. · NEVADA, USAPackage says distributed by: Amazon.com Services LLC · 7th Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109
Quick read · Amazon Basics
Amazon Basics Vitamin B12 3000 mcg Gummies
Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
100gummies · 50 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
The label says 3 g of vitamin b12 in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh. That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified6 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.17per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Amazon Technologies, Inc.corporation · NEVADA, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?Recall check not run yeta gap in our records, not a finding about the product
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
Serving size 2 Gummies · 50 servings per container
Calories
10
Total Carbohydrate
3 g
Total Sugars
2 g
Includes Added Sugars
2 g
B12 (as Methylcobalamin
3000 mcg
Sodium
15 mg
Printed on the package:Vegan · Gluten-Free
We read 6 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Quick read · 4 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationIs the label honest?
The label says 3 g of vitamin b12 in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh
That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.
Evidence and sources
A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 3,000 mg — 3 g — of vitamin b12 in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of…
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Evidence and sources
The listing presents 3 mg for vitamin b12, but vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Amazon Technologies, Inc.Corporation · exact supplement-class mark for AMAZON BASICS
Registration7208286
Registered2023-10-31
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded
Filed address Attn: Trademarks, 410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WASHINGTON 98109, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.
