Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 195515033398 · back to the summary
Amazon Basics Vitamin B12 3000 mcg Gummies, Normal Energy Production and Metabolism
Exact product checkedGTIN 00195515033398 · checked 2026-07-25
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The named ingredient is not separately quantified
MARKETING3 mg — listing title
PANELPanel read — named ingredient amount not separately listed
named amount openThe panel was read, but it does not give a separate amount for vitamin b12. The listing claim cannot be compared to a named panel row.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 2 g | — | |
| Includes Added Sugars | 2 g | — | |
| B12 (as Methylcobalamin | 3000 mcg | — | |
| Sodium | 15 mg | — |
Mass check · assumptions shown
3 g listed contents = 0 g major actives + 3 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Amazon Technologies, Inc. (CORPORATION) in NEVADA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 195515033398 to "Vitamin B12 3000mg Gummies" (Amazon Basics) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The label says 3 g of vitamin b12 in 4 gummies — but not what th
A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 3,000 mg — 3 g — of vitamin b12 in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, vitamin b12 would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 3 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked September 3, 2026.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
The listing presents 3 mg for vitamin b12, but vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 943 on 2025-07-28 to 1,126 on 2026-08-21 (net +183). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie
The package says distributed by: Amazon.com Services LLC, 7th Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109. USPTO names Amazon Technologies, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 195515033398.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “Amazon Basics Vitamin B12 3000 mcg Gummies, Normal Energy Production and Metabolism, Immune System Support, Raspberry, 100 Count (2 per Serving) (Previously Solimo)…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 195515033398 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Amazon Basics |
| Source listing identifier | B07BBFK9QZ |
| Retailer listing title | Amazon Basics Vitamin B12 3000 mcg Gummies, Normal Energy Production a… show full titleAmazon Basics Vitamin B12 3000 mcg Gummies, Normal Energy Production and Metabolism, Immune System Support, Raspberry, 100 Count (2 per Serving) (Previously Solimo) |
| USPTO brand owner | Amazon Technologies, Inc. · CORPORATION · NEVADA, USA |
| Owner filed address | Attn: Trademarks, 410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, WASHINGTON 98109, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Gummies |
| Servings per container | 50 |
| Pack statement | 100 GUMMIES |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan, Gluten-Free |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 3 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Includes Added Sugars | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| B12 (as Methylcobalamin | 3000 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 15 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“3000 mcg per serving” · “Raspberry Flavor with Other Natural Flavors” · “KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN” · “Safety-sealed” · “Gummy colors may change over time due to natural colors. This does not alter the potency of the product.” · “Any clouding of bottle is normal.” · “To ensure quality and potency through expiration, this product is manufactured with higher active ingredient levels than” · “WARNING: DO NOT EXCEED RECOMMENDED DOSAGE. IF YOU HAVE A MEDICAL CONDITION, ARE TAKING ANY PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION, OR A”
Read by a vision model from 4 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $8.44 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 195515033398 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai