Checked against public sources on July 31, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 17 ingredients listed. Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 70 |
|---|---|
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g |
| Trans Fat | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 45 mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 0 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Includes 0 g Added Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g |
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg |
| Calcium | 50 mg |
| Iron | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 0 mg |
| Vitamin C | 250 mg |
| Biotin | 300 mcg |
| Zinc | 11 mg |
Printed on the package: Grass Fed · Pasture Raised · RAISED WITHOUT HORMONES/NO RBGH
We read 17 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Collagen Peptides” (variant: 20 Servings) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
381 North Service Road West, Oakville, Ontario, L6M0H4, CANADA
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 11 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.90 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 31, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$1.00 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 31, 2026
View on Brand website ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $17.97; Brand website was highest at $19.99 — a $2.02 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built August 02, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.