The label promises 80 mg per serving. The panel says 80 mg. They match.

Zerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets
Checked against public sources on July 27, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Listing claim matches the Supplement Facts panel. The label promise and the Supplement Facts amount agree.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous) | 80 mg |
|---|---|
| Sodium (as Sodium chloride) | 1000 mg |
| Potassium (as Potassium chloride) | 300 mg |
Printed on the package: NO CARBS · NO DAIRY · NO HIDDEN INGREDIENTS · NO GLUTEN · KETO FRIENDLY · CAVEMAN FRIENDLY · VEGAN FRIENDLY · FASTING FRIENDLY
We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The checks, one by one
1 promise checks out. 1 could not be fully confirmed from public sources.
✓Matches the label1
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Listing claim matches the Supplement Facts panel
The label promise and the Supplement Facts amount agree.
Evidence and sources
The listing claims 80 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous) at 80 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its amount · 3 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode identity checks out · 744553031240.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
Open Food Facts resolves 744553031240 to "Advanced Hydration" (Zero spike) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingReaching a studied dose costs about $55/month
Comparing cost at a research-relevant amount shows how quickly the package is used and what the routine actually costs.
Evidence and sources
At 2.5 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $55 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWe can see 19 of this product’s 139 reviews — the count rose between July 15, 2025 and July 26, 2026. That is too small a slice to say anything about the wider pattern.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 120 to 139 between July 15, 2025 and July 26, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 7, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Brand ownership is not settled in this record.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Dose and research context
The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.
Magnesium
80 mg per serving — below the 200–420 mg/day used in the linked studies.
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 80 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.73 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 27, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedWe only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 27, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.