lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 744553031240 · back to the summary

Zerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts Drink Mix | Supple…

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00744553031240 · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 80 mg magnesium (as magnesium malate anhydrous) claim matches the panel

MARKETING80 mg — per-serving claim
PANELMagnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous) 80 mg — same amountSodium (as Sodium chloride) 1 g + Potassium (as Potassium chloride) 300 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 80 mg of magnesium (as magnesium malate anhydrous), and the listing-image panel shows 80 mg magnesium (as magnesium malate anhydrous) 1 stick pack (3.8g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous)80 mg
Sodium (as Sodium chloride)1000 mg
Potassium (as Potassium chloride)300 mg

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out4

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible

Claimed magnesium 80.0 mg is 2% of the ≈3,800 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 744553031240) — within physical limits.

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 744553031240 to "Advanced Hydration" (Zero spike) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 120 to 139 between July 15, 2025 and July 26, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 7, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing10

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation

Our image read produced 30 × 3.8 g = 114 g versus net weight 3.8 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.

No data

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 80 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous) at 80 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Magnesium amount, in daily-intake context

label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Cost to reach a studied dose

At 2.5 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $55 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 119 on 2025-06-30 to 139 on 2026-07-26 (net +20). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 744553031240.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Benefit claim
“…💪 SUPPORT YOUR MUSCLES: Stay within your dietary limits while smashing sets at the gym.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous)
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
80 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed magnesium 80 mg2% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 3,800 mg

The claimed magnesium dose of 80 mg fits within the ≈3,800 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
magnesium: 80 mg claimed ÷ 3,800 mg serving mass = 2%. Serving mass source: serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 035046135829. Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID744553031240 — via source listing UPC
BrandZerospike
Source listing identifierB0CK7J5PGV
Retailer listing titleZerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts …
show full title Zerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts Drink Mix | Supplements: The Key Hydration Nutrients Missing from Purified Water | Clean, Unflavored, Calorie Free | 30 Sticks

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 stick pack (3.8g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT 0.13 OZ (3.8G)
Pack statement30 STICK PACKS
Badges printed on packNO CARBS, NO DAIRY, NO HIDDEN INGREDIENTS, NO GLUTEN, KETO FRIENDLY, CAVEMAN FRIENDLY, VEGAN FRIENDLY, FASTING FRIENDLY

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Magnesium (as Magnesium malate anhydrous)80 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium (as Sodium chloride)1000 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium (as Potassium chloride)300 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“NO ADDED FLAVOR” · “1000 mg Sodium” · “300 mg Potassium” · “80 mg Magnesium” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “NO SUGAR - NO CARBS” · “NO CARBS” · “NO DAIRY”

Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$21.99 checked Jul 27, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Dosage: label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 744553031240 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai