LookCloser record · 804540020746 · methodology v0.1
This product can't be verified from public data Neither good nor bad — the checks below show what this listing publishes and what it withholds. Verifiable products publish more. Evidence availability only; this does not establish safety or effectiveness.
5 of 6 public trust signals found · 3 product-specific concerns · $0.42 per serving
This product is registered in the NIH's supplement label database, showing its Supplement Facts panel is on file. The label indicates a "Total Blend" of 2,100 mg per serving, which includes Organic Ashwagandha root powder and extract. However, the listing mentions third-party testing without public substantiation, and there's a discrepancy between the listed 2.1g claim and the 8mg of black pepper extract noted on the Supplement Facts. You can independently check the UPC on a site like UPCitemdb for consistency with the product details.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (magnesium, ashwagandha). For example, magnesium: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Label #229134 “Ashwagandha 2100 mg” (NaturaLife Labs), entered 2020-06-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — NaturaLife Labs, Inc., Torrance, CA.
UPCitemdb resolves 804540020746 to "Organic Ashwagandha 2 100 mg - 100 Vegan Capsules Pure Organic Ashwagandha Powde" (NaturaLife Labs) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
label claims 2100 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
The panel lists “Total Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
The listing claims third-party testing without naming any lab or certifier, so the claim can't be verified as stated.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
What this means: the listing doesn't publish servings per container, so the dose claim can't be checked against physics from public data. That's neither a pass nor a strike — but it does mean you're taking the label on faith. Checkable products publish these numbers.
Marketplace rating 4.5★ across 52,752 ratings. Authenticity not analysed: burst, purge and stockout patterns need price/review history.
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $13 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 804540020746.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
The full report is free no signup · no paywall
Every check, claim, label read, dose comparison, registry search, source, and date. Free to read, download, and share.
Want to know if this changes?
Supplements are repeat purchases. Formulas get reformulated, lots get recalled, brands finally publish the lab report they were asked for. We can watch this record and email you only if something changes.
Your address is used for this one purpose. No newsletter, no marketing, no third parties, no tracking pixels — and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login. We store the address, the record, and the date. Nothing else.
Record built July 21, 2026. Sources: source listing (live fetch) · brand's own storefront · published independent assays (NOW Foods 2024, SuppCo 2025; brand-level) · PubMed · openFDA · Open Food Facts · NIH DSLD · LookCloser ingredient KB. Evidence-tiered statements of documented fact; conclusions belong to the reader. Beta: this report isn’t yet independently archived — treat it as a well-sourced starting point, not a certificate. Evidence-based corrections welcome.