“Zinc 50 mg per serving”
Evidence →The label promises 50 mg per serving. The panel says 50 mg. They match.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00810139573005Nutricost · checked Jul 23, 2026 · on sale since Nov 1, 2017🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · eSupplements, LLC · UTAH, USAPackage says manufactured for: nutricosť · 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059
Quick read · Nutricost
Nutricost Zinc Picolinate 50mg
Checked against public sources between July 23 and September 1, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
240capsules
240servings per container
Does the marketing hold up?
Listing claim matches the Supplement Facts panel. The label promise and the Supplement Facts amount agree.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified1 ingredient listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.07per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — not yet checked
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸eSupplements, LLClimited liability company · UTAH, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?Recall check not run yeta gap in our records, not a finding about the product
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1✓ checked out2◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Zinc (as zinc picolinate) | 50mg 455% |
|---|
Printed on the package: QUALITY nutriblend GUARANTEED · VEGETARIAN PRODUCT · GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCT · NON-GMO PRODUCT · GMP COMPLIANT FACILITY · THIRD PARTY TESTED · QUALITY nutricost GUARANTEED · NON-GMO
We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
1 promise checks out. 2 could not be fully confirmed from public sources.
✓Matches the label1
◐Partly confirmed2
“PARTY”
Evidence →A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis.
“Vegetarian Caps Per Bottle 50 mg of Zinc (from Zinc Picolinate) Per Serving 240 Servings of Zinc Picolinate Per Bottle Non-GMO and Gluten Free…”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
CheckedIs the label honest?
Listing claim matches the Supplement Facts panel
The label promise and the Supplement Facts amount agree.
Evidence and sources
The listing claims 50 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Zinc (as zinc picolinate) at 50 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedWho is behind it?
The barcode identity checks out · 810139573005.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
Open Food Facts resolves 810139573005 to "Zinc Picolinate" (Nutricost) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
eSupplements, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for NUTRICOST
Filed address
UTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
The label amount is shown beside the range used in the linked ingredient studies.
Dose vs research
Zinc
STUDIED RANGE055 mg
50 mg per serving — above the 8–40 mg/day used in the linked studies.
Linked ingredient research · label amount, not a recommendation
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$17.95
$0.07 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 29, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Exact UPC/GTIN match$17.95
$0.07 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 24, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Brand website
Official product-page candidate · UPC absent$19.97
Official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.
Nutricost Zinc Picolinate Capsules · 240 Caps. Confirm the package UPC/GTIN before buying.
Check brand website ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers at the same price at check time.
The brand-page price is shown as a shopping lead only. It is excluded from the exact-product price difference because the page does not publish this record's matching UPC/GTIN.
The observed listing and related brand page repeat 50 mg, 240 servings. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.