lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810139573005 · back to the summary

Nutricost Zinc Picolinate 50mg, 240 Vegetarian Capsules

5 concrete dimensions confirmed · 0 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810139573005 · checked 2026-07-23

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 50 mg zinc (as zinc picolinate) claim matches the panel

MARKETING50 mg — per-serving claim
PANELZinc (as zinc picolinate) 50 mg — same amount
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 50 mg of zinc (as zinc picolinate), and the listing-image panel shows 50 mg zinc (as zinc picolinate) 1 capsule. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)50mg 455%

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Testing claim names a recognized certifier

A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists eSupplements, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in UTAH, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 810139573005 to "Zinc Picolinate" (Nutricost) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Dose claim implausibly high for a capsule

Claimed zinc 50.0 mg is 100% of the ≈50 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 810139573005) — above what gummy matrices realistically carry.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing7

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 50 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Zinc (as zinc picolinate) at 50 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

Zinc amount, in daily-intake context

label states 50 mg/serving — about 125% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 423 on 2025-08-01 to 492 on 2026-08-17 (net +69). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says manufactured for: nutricosť, 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059. USPTO names eSupplements, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810139573005.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…THIRD PARTY TESTED…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis.
Manufacturing claim
“…240 Vegetarian Caps Per Bottle 50 mg of Zinc (from Zinc Picolinate) Per Serving 240 Servings of Zinc Picolinate Per Bottle Non-GMO and Gluten Free Manufactured in an NSF”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
50 mg — above the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed zinc 50 mg100% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 50 mg

The claimed zinc dose of 50 mg fits within the ≈50 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
zinc: 50 mg claimed ÷ 50 mg serving mass = 100%. Serving mass source: listing-derived. Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 5 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found✓ Third-party lab named or registry-certified· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810139573005 — via source listing UPC
BrandNutricost
Source listing identifierB07735XF2K
Retailer listing titleNutricost Zinc Picolinate 50mg, 240 Vegetarian Capsules, Gluten Free…
show full title Nutricost Zinc Picolinate 50mg, 240 Vegetarian Capsules, Gluten Free
USPTO brand ownereSupplements, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · UTAH, USA
Owner filed addressUTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Capsule
Servings per container240
Pack statement240 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packQUALITY nutriblend GUARANTEED, VEGETARIAN PRODUCT, GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCT, NON-GMO PRODUCT, GMP COMPLIANT FACILITY, THIRD PARTY TESTED, QUALITY nutricost GUARANTEED, NON-GMO, GLUTEN-FREE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)50mg 455%High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Zinc Per Serving” · “50MG Zinc Per Serving” · “240 Capsules” · “240 Servings” · “quality” · “QUALITY ASSURED” · “THIRD PARTY TESTED” · “NON-GMO”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.

Brand store nutricost.com: 199 supplement products (+51 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Dosage: label states 50 mg/serving — about 125% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810139573005 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai