lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810172790025 · back to the summary

Proper, The Greens Daily Boost Organic Greens Powder. Whole Food

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend

The panel lists “Fiber Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (prebiotic fiber, multivitamin / greens blend). For example, prebiotic fiber: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

UPC independently corroborated

Open Food Facts resolves 810172790025 to "Daily Boost Nutrient Dense Superfood Powder" (proper) — consistent with this listing.

Testing claim names a recognized certifier

A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).

No data yet: Photo-read panel arithmetic needs confirmation

Our image read produced 387,177 mg across 13 actives for an ≈5,800 mg serving. That cannot be reconciled, but tiny-print OCR can confuse mg and mcg; the physical label or an exact filed document must settle it.

No data yet: Trademark owner candidates are ambiguous

USPTO returned multiple live supplement-related marks with the exact brand wordmark and different registrants. The owner is withheld until the product-to-mark identity is pinned down.

i

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 5.8 g = 174 g, matching the printed net weight 174 g (NET WT. 6.13 OZ (174G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

i

Recall search: no match found (as of Jul 21, 2026)

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 165 on 2026-01-22 to 222 on 2026-07-16 (net +57). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

i

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…The Greens superfood powder is plant-based, third-party tested, non-GMO, manufactured by a USP-certified fa…”
Partly supported
We looked for: a named laboratory, a certificate of analysis, or a certification-registry entry
A testing body is named on the listing, but no lot-specific certificate of analysis was located.
Benefit claim
“Proper, The Greens Daily Boost Organic Greens Powder. Whole Food, Apple Fla…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
3 g — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Third-party lab named or registry-certified· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Brand's own store found — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810172790025
BrandProper
Source listing identifierB0DWQV1LHN
Retailer listing titleProper, The Greens Daily Boost Organic Greens Powder. Whole Food, Appl…
show full title Proper, The Greens Daily Boost Organic Greens Powder. Whole Food, Apple Flavour Veggie Powder Superfood with Wheatgrass, Spirulina, Chlorella, Probiotics. Daily Drink Mix for Wellness and Digestion

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Scoop (5.8 g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT. 6.13 OZ (174G)
Badges printed on packORGANIC, Third-party Tested, Non-GMO, USP Certified Facility, Plant-based, Gluten Free, Dairy Free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories15 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate4g High
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber3g High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate)50 mcg mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C (as ascorbic acid)10 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D (as vegan cholecalciferol)2 mcg mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K (as phylloquinone)65 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Thiamin (as thiamin HCI)0.1 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Riboflavin0.2 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin (as niacinamide)1.1 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B6 (as pyriodoxine HCI)0.1 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B12 (as cyanocobalamin)0.3 mcg mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium5 mg mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Fiber Blend3g High
clearly legible in the photo
Essential Greens Blend1.1g High
clearly legible in the photo
Digestive Enzyme Blend375g High
clearly legible in the photo
Bacillus coagulans (providing 1 billion CFU)8g High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Nutrient Dense Superfood Powder” · “A nutrient-dense blend of fruits, veggies & superfoods to support daily wellness.” · “Stay energized and strong with these ingredients packed with essential nutrients.” · “Packed with phytonutrients and antioxidants” · “PROMOTES OVERALL WELL-BEING” · “Natural Ingredients” · “Trusted Quality”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin ANIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

ThiaminNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,262) · no UL established

RiboflavinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (3,172) · no UL established

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

Vitamin B12NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

multivitamin / greens blendNIH ODS — Multivitamin/mineral supplements fact sheet · PubMed search: multivitamin supplementation outcomes · ClinicalTrials.gov — 497 registered studies

Use pattern in research: research evaluates multivitamins ingredient-by-ingredient — blend-level health claims outrun what blend-level evidence can show.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810172790025 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai