LookCloser.aipublic evidence record

LookCloser record · 852446007088 · methodology v0.1

Nested Naturals Super Greens Daily Superfood Powder

Rebuilt from public sources on July 21, 2026.

Result
MODERATE public verifiability

Caution — unverified claims Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend. Evidence availability only; this does not establish safety or effectiveness.

4 of 6 public trust signals found · 1 product-specific concern · $1.40 per serving

The short read

This product's listed ingredients are physically impossible as stated because the sum of the individual active ingredients exceeds the total weight of a single serving. While the product is listed as USDA Organic, this doesn't confirm the amounts of the individual ingredients. You can check the "Supplement Facts" panel on the product's packaging to compare it with the panel shown in the listing.

Why this result?
We ran this product through public-record checks — label math, barcode registries, FDA recall lists, published lab tests. This banner sums up what those checks could and couldn’t confirm. Green means nothing public contradicted the label — not proof it works or is safe. Gray means the data to check simply isn’t public: a gap, not a verdict. We show the evidence; the conclusion is yours.

Confirmed evidence

What checked out03

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Taken the way the research studied it

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (prebiotic fiber, multivitamin / greens blend). For example, prebiotic fiber: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

Confirmed

Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record

Label #317232 “Super Greens Original Flavor” (Nested Naturals), entered 2024-09-25, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — Nested Naturals Inc. , Vancouver, BC.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 852446007088 to "Super greens" () — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution01

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend

The panel lists “Alkalizing Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing06

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Photo-read panel arithmetic needs confirmation

Our image read produced 10,149 mg across 8 actives for an ≈8,000 mg serving. That cannot be reconciled, but tiny-print OCR can confuse mg and mcg; the physical label or an exact filed document must settle it.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The listing claims third-party testing without naming any lab or certifier, so the claim can't be verified as stated.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 8 g = 240 g, matching the printed net weight 240 g (NET WT 8.5 OZ (240G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Organic By Nature, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2020-02-24: “Firm was notified by supplier that Organic Ground Flaxseed powder was under recall by manufacturer due to unapproved herbicide - Haloxyfop” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Nested Naturals Super Kids; Superfood Powder Full of Nutrients for Growing Bodies; Whole Food Powder, Net Wt. 7.5 oz (210g), 30 servings; Finished Product Item # FNNKFMSG210G; ” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 4,670 on 2026-01-23 to 4,659 on 2026-06-12 (net -11). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 852446007088.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

The full report is free no signup · no paywall

Every check, claim, label read, dose comparison, registry search, source, and date. Free to read, download, and share.

Read the full report — free →

Want to know if this changes?

Supplements are repeat purchases. Formulas get reformulated, lots get recalled, brands finally publish the lab report they were asked for. We can watch this record and email you only if something changes.

Your address is used for this one purpose. No newsletter, no marketing, no third parties, no tracking pixels — and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login. We store the address, the record, and the date. Nothing else.

Record built July 21, 2026. Sources: source listing (live fetch) · brand's own storefront · published independent assays (NOW Foods 2024, SuppCo 2025; brand-level) · PubMed · openFDA · Open Food Facts · NIH DSLD · LookCloser ingredient KB. Evidence-tiered statements of documented fact; conclusions belong to the reader. Beta: this report isn’t yet independently archived — treat it as a well-sourced starting point, not a certificate. Evidence-based corrections welcome.