GMP or manufacturing-quality language
Evidence →Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located.
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedNaturaLife Labs · observed 2026-07-21🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · NaturaLife Labs, Inc · California, USA
Quick read · NaturaLife Labs
NaturaLife Labs Organic Maca Root – Black
Marketing check: 3 remain partly or independently unverified.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
150capsules · 75 servings
Marketing claims, checked
Does the marketing hold up?
Couldn’t verify means public proof was not found; it is not a mark against the product. Ingredient research is not treated as a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently3
US manufacturing or origin language
Evidence →“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
1 more public-evidence limit
“Third-party tested”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Quick read · 2 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Checks outWho is behind it?
Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
A government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Evidence and sources
Label #229147 “Maca 1900 mg” (NaturaLife Labs), entered 2020-07-23, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — NaturaLife Labs, Inc, Torrance, CA.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWho owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
NaturaLife Labs, IncCorporation · exact supplement-class mark for NATURALIFE LABS
Filed address
21515 Hawthorne Blvd suite 200, Torrance, California 90503, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
Ingredient context used alongside the captured panel. These sources do not test this product or establish safety or effectiveness.
Buying options
Where you can check or buy it
Open related seller leads before buying, then confirm the flavor, count, and serving size. Their prices are visible, but LookCloser does not claim savings until the pages share a UPC/GTIN.
Amazon
Submitted listingNo price confirmed
Exact page checked on 2026-07-21; current price was not retained.
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Related product page · UPC absent$17.95
Useful as a related-size lead, not as an exact price comparison.
Organic Maca Root 1900 mg – 150 Capsules · Default Title. It repeats 1,900 mg, 150 capsules, but the exact sellable unit is not established.
Check brand website ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Related brand page publishes 4.4/5 across 32,711 reviews
The related page's review pool may differ from the observed listing. Because the page does not publish a matching UPC/GTIN, LookCloser does not attribute that review aggregate to this exact sellable unit.
Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out02
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists NaturaLife Labs, Inc (CORPORATION) in California, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #229147 “Maca 1900 mg” (NaturaLife Labs), entered 2020-07-23, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. Company on file: Distributor — NaturaLife Labs, Inc, Torrance, CA.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing04
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how maca root have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial, NIH NCCIH — Maca.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-01-23 to 5,082 on 2026-06-24 (net +5,082). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
3
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
4
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.