Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists NaturaLife Labs, Inc (CORPORATION) in California, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-4b240fb5 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 3 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 5 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrates | 2 g | — | |
| Maca Blend Organic Black Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) (Root) Powder, Organic Red Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) (Root) Powder, Organic Yellow Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) (Root) Powder. | 1,900 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists NaturaLife Labs, Inc (CORPORATION) in California, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Label #229147 “Maca 1900 mg” (NaturaLife Labs), entered 2020-07-23, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — NaturaLife Labs, Inc, Torrance, CA.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The observed listing and a related brand product page both claim third-party testing. Neither names the laboratory or links a product- or lot-specific report. The related page does not publish this record's UPC. Repeating the claim across two pages confirms the brand publishes it, not that testing occurred. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how maca root have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial, NIH NCCIH — Maca.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-01-23 to 5,076 on 2026-08-28 (net +5,076). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Purity & Potency…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…d yellow varieties ✔️ 1,900 mg per Serving - 150 capsules per bottle ✔️ Clean Label- Made without fillers, binders, magnesium stearate, or artifical additives ✔️ Quality” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…^Manufactured in the USA with domestic and international ingredients.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Maca Blend Organic Black Maca (Lepidium meye | shaded = doses used in studies (1.5 g–3 g) · bar = this label | 1.9 g — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-4b240fb5 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | NaturaLife Labs |
| Source listing identifier | B01M362DU7 |
| Retailer listing title | NaturaLife Labs Organic Maca Root – Black, Red & Yellow – 1900 mg per … show full titleNaturaLife Labs Organic Maca Root – Black, Red & Yellow – 1900 mg per Serving – 150 Capsules – Gelatinized Peruvian Maca – Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, Vegan |
| USPTO brand owner | NaturaLife Labs, Inc · CORPORATION · California, USA |
| Owner filed address | 21515 Hawthorne Blvd suite 200, Torrance, California 90503, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 75 |
| Pack statement | 150 Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | USDA ORGANIC, GELATINIZED, MFD IN THE USA, Vegan, Allergen Free, Purity & Potency TESTED, THIRD PARTY TESTED, MADE WITH NON-GMO INGREDIENTS, LAB TESTED, NON-GMO, Certified Organic, CCOF, ORGANIC |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 5 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrates | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Maca Blend Organic Black Maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) (Root | 1,900 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“A Higher Standard” · “GELATINIZED” · “Mixed: Red • Black • Yellow” · “Dietary Supplement” · “Formula you trust” · “now USDA Organic Certified” · “MFD IN THE USA^” · “Purity & Potency”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry
serving: 2 Capsule(s) · contents: 150 Veggie Capsule(s) · label #229147 at dsld.od.nih.gov
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| organic Maca | 1900 mg |
mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store naturalifelabs.com: 2 supplement products (+13 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
maca root — PubMed search: Lepidium meyenii randomized trial · NIH NCCIH — Maca · ClinicalTrials.gov — 9 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied for libido-related endpoints; research generally does not show testosterone changes — the two are often conflated in marketing.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record lc-4b240fb5 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai