“Certified”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedchenyayun · checked Aug 9, 2026 · on sale since Oct 23, 2025
Quick read · chenyayun
chenyayun 90 Chews Beet Root Gummies, Sugar Free
Checked against public sources on August 9, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
90gummies · 45 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
The label says 4.6 g of coq10 in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh. That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified13 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?No exact match in USPTO
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Total Calories | 17 |
|---|---|
| Protein | 0 g |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4.3 g |
| Total Fat | 0 g |
| Total Sugars | 0 g |
| Sodium | 12 mg |
| Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid) | 20 mg |
| Vitamin B12 (as Cyanocobalamin) | 20 mcg |
| Beet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) | 200 mg |
| Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) | 100 mg |
| Coenzyme Q10 | 50 mg |
| Nitric Oxide Support Complex (L-Arginine, L-Citrulline) | 50 mg |
| Black Pepper Extract | 3 mg |
Printed on the package: Vegan Friendly · Gluten Free · Sugar Free · GMP Certified · Good Manufacturing Practice
We read 13 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Marketing language, not scored
8-IN-1 PREMIUM BLEND
Quick read · 4 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationIs the label honest?
The label says 4.6 g of coq10 in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh
That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.
Evidence and sources
A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 4,600 mg — 4.6 g — of coq10 in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingPublic contextIs the label honest?
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Evidence and sources
The listing presents 200 mg for coq10, but vision:claude-cli:subscription does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 13 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 30 to 87 between February 11 and August 3, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 30 to 87 between February 11 and August 3, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 28, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 2
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- Brand ownership is not settled in this record.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Buying options
Where you can check or buy it
Only the submitted seller page is identity-certain. Other destinations are shown as leads until a shared UPC/GTIN confirms the exact product.
Amazon
Submitted listing$13.76
Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-08-09.
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo price confirmed
No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.
Search Walmart ↗Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 09, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.