Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · lc-822f4af5 · back to the summary
chenyayun 90 Chews Beet Root Gummies, Sugar Free | 8 in 1 Beet Root Extract with CoQ10
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-08-09
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 200 mg number matches named panel rows
MARKETING200 mg — per-serving claim
PANELBeet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) 200 mg + Black Pepper Extract 3 mg = 203 mgBeet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) 200 mg + Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) 100 mg
component totalWe did the comparison: the per-serving claim uses 200 mg, which equals Beet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) 200 mg + Black Pepper Extract 3 mg. It is a combined amount, not the amount of one ingredient. The full listed active total is 403 mg including the other panel rows. This explains the label framing; it does not independently test the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Calories | 17 | — | |
| Protein | 0 g | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4.3 g | — | |
| Total Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | — | |
| Sodium | 12 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid) | 20 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 (as Cyanocobalamin) | 20 mcg | — | |
| Beet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) | 200 mg | — | |
| Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) | 100 mg | — | |
| Coenzyme Q10 | 50 mg | — | |
| Nitric Oxide Support Complex (L-Arginine, L-Citrulline) | 50 mg | — | |
| Black Pepper Extract | 3 mg | — |
Mass check · assumptions shown
4.6 g listed contents = 0.3 g major actives + 4.3 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 30 to 87 between February 11 and August 3, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 28, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The label says 4.6 g of coq10 in 4 gummies — but not what those
A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 4,600 mg — 4.6 g — of coq10 in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, coq10 would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 4.6 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked August 9, 2026.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
The listing presents 200 mg for coq10, but vision:claude-cli:subscription does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 29 on 2026-01-29 to 87 on 2026-08-03 (net +58). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Brand ownership record not saved
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: the 0.2 g listing number equals Beet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg of Beet Root) 200 mg + Black Pepper Extract 3 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those listed amounts?
The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those listed amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.
2
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP Certified…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…【High-Potency Formula】Enriched with 200mg of CoQ10 & Beet Root Extract of per serving, it means our beet root gummies promote Nitric Oxide production much more effective” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ Per-serving dose established✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-822f4af5 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | chenyayun |
| Source listing identifier | B0FXGCVLT4 |
| Retailer listing title | chenyayun 90 Chews Beet Root Gummies, Sugar Free | 8 in 1 Beet Root Ex… show full titlechenyayun 90 Chews Beet Root Gummies, Sugar Free | 8 in 1 Beet Root Extract with CoQ10, Grapeseed Extract 90 Chews for Antioxidant, Promoting Nitric Oxide, Energy Level Suport, with Vitamin B12, C |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 2 Gummies |
| Servings per container | 45 |
| Pack statement | 90 Gummies |
| Badges printed on pack | Vegan Friendly, Gluten Free, Sugar Free, GMP Certified, Good Manufacturing Practice |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Total Calories | 17 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4.3 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 12 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C (as Ascorbic Acid) | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 (as Cyanocobalamin) | 20 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Beet Root Extract 20:1 (Beta Vulgaris)(equivalent to 4,000mg | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Coenzyme Q10 | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Nitric Oxide Support Complex (L-Arginine, L-Citrulline) | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Black Pepper Extract | 3 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“8-IN-1 PREMIUM BLEND” · “4,000MG PER SERVING EQUIVALENT*” · “Natural Antioxidant Support*” · “Daily Nutritional Support*” · “Supports Overall Wellness*” · “Supports Nutrient Absorption*” · “Helps maintain healthy blood pressure* (already within the normal range)” · “Supports healthy circulation*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-822f4af5 · built August 09, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai