full reportFull record · lc-ad48a86e · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 1 separately quantified row and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| L-Glutathione | 1500 mg | — | |
| Optimised Stability Blend | 500 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C (as Sodium Ascorbate) | — | — | |
| Aloe Vera Extract | — | — | |
| (Aloe barbadensis) (Inner Leaf Gel) | — | — | |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as Sodium Hyaluronate) | — | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 85 on 2025-08-20 to 135 on 2026-08-29 (net +50). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICE…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…MADE IN THE USA…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “2000MG Liposomal Glutathione Liquid Drops, Ultra High Absorption, Natural Detoxification, Immune System & Skin Support*, L-Glutathione, Vitamin C & Hyaluronic Acid, Capsu” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-ad48a86e (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Zeylamum |
| Source listing identifier | B0CB6Y4FP6 |
| Retailer listing title | 2000MG Liposomal Glutathione Liquid Drops, Ultra High Absorption, Natu… show full title2000MG Liposomal Glutathione Liquid Drops, Ultra High Absorption, Natural Detoxification, Immune System & Skin Support*, L-Glutathione, Vitamin C & Hyaluronic Acid, Capsules Alternative, 4.05 OZ |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 ml |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | 60ML (2FL.OZ.) |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP CERTIFIED PRACTICE, GMO FREE, GLUTEN FREE, GOOD MANUFACTURING CERTIFIED PRACTICE, GMP, MADE IN THE USA, ENHANCED ABSORPTION, DIETARY SUPPLEMENT |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| L-Glutathione | 1500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Optimised Stability Blend | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C (as Sodium Ascorbate) | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Aloe Vera Extract | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| (Aloe barbadensis) (Inner Leaf Gel) | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Hyaluronic Acid (as Sodium Hyaluronate) | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“PLUS VITAMIN C & HYALURONIC” · “ACID & ALOE VERA” · “ENHANCED ABSORPTION” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “MAXIMUM ABSORPTION & BIOAVAILABILITY” · “98% Potency Liposomal Glutathione Drops” · “Liposome Delivery” · “40% Potency Glutathione Pills & Capsules”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record lc-ad48a86e · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai