LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · barcode not publishedPuyflam · checked Aug 16, 2026 · on sale since Feb 24, 2026🇨🇳 USPTO wordmark owner · WANG BING · China
Quick read · Puyflam

NAD Supplement, 12-in-1 Liposomal NAD+ Plus with…

Checked against public sources on August 16, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

90capsules · 45 servings

Does the marketing hold up?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend”. A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified4 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?NSF seal printed on the labelwe read it off the package photo; not confirmed in NSF’s registry
Who’s behind it?🇨🇳WANG BINGindividual · China
Is it the real thing?No barcode publishedso it can’t be matched against certification, recall or other retailer records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 2 Vegetarian Capsules · 45 servings per container

Liposomal* NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide)600 mg
Trans-Resveratrol150 mg
PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend295 mg
Antioxidant Proprietary Blend305 mg

Printed on the package: GMP · GLUTEN FREE · VEGAN FRIENDLY · NON-GMO · NSF · cGMP · ANAB

We read 4 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed1

“bottle provides 90 vegetarian capsules and 45 servings, made in a GMP facility with gluten-free ingredients for your daily healthy aging and wellness”

“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationIs the label honest?

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend”

A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.

Evidence and sources

The panel lists “PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend” (295 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?

Reviews rose from 3 to 8 between July 30 and August 15, 2026 — no sudden jump.

A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.

Evidence and sources

Written reviews rose from 3 to 8 between July 30 and August 15, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 1
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇨🇳
WANG BINGIndividual · exact supplement-class mark for PUYFLAM
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded
Show the exact filed address in the full report
ROOM 404, BLOCK F, BUILDING 1, JINXIU GARDEN, NO. 99, LONGHUA LONGFA ROAD, LONGHUA DISTRICT, SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, 518000, CHINA

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Buying options

Where you can check or buy it

Open related seller leads before buying, then confirm the flavor, count, and serving size. Their prices are visible, but LookCloser does not claim savings until the pages share a UPC/GTIN.

Amazon

Submitted listing
$40.99

Lowest New observed via Keepa on 2026-08-16.

View on Amazon ↗

Brand website

Official storefront
No price confirmed

Open the brand storefront to search manually.

No defensible same-product page was saved from the brand catalog.

Check brand website ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No price confirmed

No matching product page was confirmed in the current record. Search results cannot be attached as this product until the UPC/GTIN matches.

Search Walmart ↗

Prices and stock are point-in-time observations. Related pages are never used as product evidence. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 16, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.