Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists WANG BING (INDIVIDUAL) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · lc-c55b0f68 · back to the summary
NAD Supplement, 12-in-1 Liposomal NAD+ Plus with Trans-Resveratrol
Exact product checkedGTIN not published · checked 2026-08-16
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
4listed rows
2separately quantified
2combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 2 separately ingredients with amounts and 2 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomal* NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) | 600 mg | — | |
| Trans-Resveratrol | 150 mg | — | |
| PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend | 295 mg | — | |
| Antioxidant Proprietary Blend | 305 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 3 to 8 between July 30 and August 15, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
What needs caution2
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The front says 12-in-1; the label publishes 4 amounts
The listing advertises “12-in-1”. The Supplement Facts panel publishes 4 amounts. The remaining ingredients may be present without a published amount. A count on the front of a pack is not the same as an amount on the back, and only the amount tells you how much you are getting.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing4
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-07-16 to 8 on 2026-08-15 (net +8). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the product’s UPC or GTIN?
The barcode is how a product gets matched to outside records — certification registries, label databases, recall data. Without it, almost nothing can be cross-checked.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…Each bottle provides 90 vegetarian capsules and 45 servings, made in a GMP facility with gluten-free ingredients for your daily healthy aging and wellness routine.…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “NAD Supplement, 12-in-1 Liposomal NAD+ Plus with Trans-Resveratrol, CoQ10, PQQ & Alpha Lipoic Acid, Healthy Aging & Cellular Wellness Support for Women and Men, NMN & NMN” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· UPC / GTIN published — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| LookCloser record ID | lc-c55b0f68 (internal — no barcode published, which limits cross-checking) |
| Brand | Puyflam |
| Source listing identifier | B0GPW394W7 |
| Retailer listing title | NAD Supplement, 12-in-1 Liposomal NAD+ Plus with Trans-Resveratrol, Co… show full titleNAD Supplement, 12-in-1 Liposomal NAD+ Plus with Trans-Resveratrol, CoQ10, PQQ & Alpha Lipoic Acid, Healthy Aging & Cellular Wellness Support for Women and Men, NMN & NMNH Alternative, 90 Caps |
| USPTO brand owner | WANG BING · INDIVIDUAL · China |
| Owner filed address | ROOM 404, BLOCK F, BUILDING 1, JINXIU GARDEN, NO. 99, LONGHUA LONGFA ROAD, LONGHUA DISTRICT, SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, 518000, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Vegetarian Capsules |
| Servings per container | 45 |
| Pack statement | 90 Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, Good Manufacturing Practice Certified, GLUTEN FREE, VEGAN FRIENDLY, NON-GMO, NSF, cGMP, ANAB |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Liposomal* NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) | 600 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trans-Resveratrol | 150 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| PhytoVitality Proprietary Blend | 295 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Antioxidant Proprietary Blend | 305 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“NMN ALTERNATIVE” · “Supports NAD+ Levels*” · “Promotes Vitality And Wellness*” · “Supports Healthy Aging*” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “NAD+ Supplementation for Age-Related Decline” · “NAD+ levels decline significantly from age 25; plummeting over 50% after 30.” · “Our formula directly rebuilds them—renew energy and support healthy aging.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store puyflam.com: 1 supplement product — a small, focused catalog — the shape of a brand built around its own line.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record lc-c55b0f68 · built August 16, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai